Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Relative control optimization algorithms

Relative and absolute MIP gap mixed integer programming parameter for controlling optimization accuracy e g. MIP gap of 1% leads to an algorithm stop, if the objective value cannot be improved within a tolerance interval of 1%. [Pg.210]

Fig. 12.5 Control of photodissociation of the Fe(CO)B molecule by feedback-optimized phase-shaped femtosecond laser pulses (a) schematic diagram of the experimental setup (b) relative product yields derived from the relative peak heights of the pertinent mass spectra. The Fe(CO) /Fe+ ratio was both maximized (solid blocks) and minimized (open blocks) by the optimization algorithm, yielding significantly different Fe+ and Fe(CO) abrm-dances in the two cases. (Reprinted with courtesy and permission of AAAS (USA) from Assion et al. 1998.)... Fig. 12.5 Control of photodissociation of the Fe(CO)B molecule by feedback-optimized phase-shaped femtosecond laser pulses (a) schematic diagram of the experimental setup (b) relative product yields derived from the relative peak heights of the pertinent mass spectra. The Fe(CO) /Fe+ ratio was both maximized (solid blocks) and minimized (open blocks) by the optimization algorithm, yielding significantly different Fe+ and Fe(CO) abrm-dances in the two cases. (Reprinted with courtesy and permission of AAAS (USA) from Assion et al. 1998.)...
The algorithm of cj, calculation is also of little. sensitivity to the relative refractive index of particles in the range n < 1 therefore, it seems reasonable to develop ways for controlling the particle size at S fT (an additional way of STT optimization). [Pg.332]

The MR fluid-based suspension systems implemented on these various vehicles enable simultaneous ride comfort control and body motion control. As indicated in Fig. 6.85, the control system architecture for these systems processes inputs from relative position sensors at each wheel. In addition, inputs from a lateral accelerometer, yaw rate sensor, steering angle sensor and speed sensor all feed by way of a CAN BUS into the controller. The control algorithms are quite complex and seek to simultaneously optimize a wide range of performance features including overall handling, overall ride comfort, body control, road noise, head toss and a subjective safe feeling. [Pg.198]

The main algorithmic contributions of this research are described in the next four chapters. Ch ter 6 presents the relative scheduling formulation that includes description of the algorithms and analysis of their prqterties. Chapto 7 describes conflict resolution under timing constraints. Chapter 8 describes the generation of the control circuit from a relative schedule. Chapter 9 describes the control resynchronization optimization that reduces the area of the control implementation under timing and synchronization constraints. [Pg.18]


See other pages where Relative control optimization algorithms is mentioned: [Pg.305]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.606]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.2403]    [Pg.513]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.496]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.1265]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.49]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.223 ]




SEARCH



Control algorithm

Control optimization

Control optimizing

Control optimizing controllers

Optimization algorithms

Relative control optimization

© 2024 chempedia.info