Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Reduced resonance integral

Knowing that with this convention, hab is replaced by a reduced resonance integral (3afo in the expression of the energy terms, express the energies of (A B) and the matrix element ( a ab H a bb ) in terms of [iai, and Sab ((3 and S for short)... [Pg.72]

In qualitative VB theory, it is customary to take the average value of the orbital energies as the origin for various quantities. With this convention, and using some simple algebra, the monoelectronic Hamiltonian between two orbitals becomes Pab, the familiar reduced resonance integral ... [Pg.29]

Here, p is the reduced resonance integral that we have just defined and S is the overlap between orbitals a and b. Note that if instead of using purely localized AOs for a and b, we use semilocalized Coulson-Fischer orbitals, Eq. [41] will not be the simple HL-bond energy but would represent the bonding energy of the real A B bond that includes its optimized covalent and ionic components. In this case, the origins of the energy would still correspond to the QC determinant with the localized orbitals. Unless otherwise specified, we will always use qualitative VB theory with this latter convention. [Pg.30]

Fig. 2.1 The matrix elements Sab = S,Hab,Haa, the reduced resonance integral and energy eigenvalues of as functions of nuclear distance. The equilibrium value corresponds to the minimum of in the LCAO approximation used (ao = Bohr unit of length = 0.529 A Eq = Hartree energy unit = 27.21 eV). FVom Ref. [20]. Fig. 2.1 The matrix elements Sab = S,Hab,Haa, the reduced resonance integral and energy eigenvalues of as functions of nuclear distance. The equilibrium value corresponds to the minimum of in the LCAO approximation used (ao = Bohr unit of length = 0.529 A Eq = Hartree energy unit = 27.21 eV). FVom Ref. [20].
Thus, the allowance for the dependence of the resonance integral on qsk may not be reduced in general to averaging the transition probability over the distribution function in Eq. (102). The function s(qk) plays the role of the distribution function for the coordinates qk in the case of the symmetric transition. In the classical limit, the results of Flynn and Stoneham62 can be obtained from Eq. (103), and in the low-temperature limit, the result of Kagan and Klinger64 can be obtained. [Pg.147]

One of the most used approaches for predicting homoaromaticity has been the perturbational molecular orbital (PMO) theory of Dewar (1969) as developed by Haddon (1975). This method is based on perturbations in the Hiickel MO theory based on reducing the resonance integral (/3) of one bond. This bond represents the homoaromatic linkage. The main advantage of this method is its simplicity. PMO theory predicted many potential homoaromatic species and gave rise to several experimental investigations. [Pg.322]

The next case is that in which the resonance integrals between a perimeter atom r and its two neighbours, p and q, are reduced equally to final values j8,j,=/3,.j = 0. [Pg.94]

The fivefold symmetry has been reduced to symmetry through a plane. These symmetry orbitals can be found easily, merely by redoing the calculations using slightly modified values for C, (e.g. 1.01/7 for its resonance integral). [Pg.39]

Denotes a spin—orbital in a Slater determinant with spin (3, where the identity of the spin is indicated by the bar over the orbital symbol. The lack of the bar indicates a spin orbital with spin a. Denotes the reduced matrix element, for example, (3afo = hab — 0.5(haa + hbb)Sab. This reduced matrix element is equivalent to the resonance integral of the Hiickel type. [Pg.310]

The multi-electron nature of the energetically favorable process does not evidently impose any new, additional restriction on its velocity. Within a coordination sphere the orbital overlap is effective and, therefore the resonance integral V is high. The strong delocalization of electrons in clusters, polynuclear complexes in clusters and polynuclear complexes reduces to a minimum the reconstitution of the nuclear system during electronic transitions and, therefore, provides a high value for the synchronization factor. [Pg.67]

A is the Coulomb integral and j8 is the resonance integral . Equation 13 derives from equation 10a in the same way that equation 11 derives from 10 and it shows that one effect of conjugation is to reduce the ionization energy of the uppermost occupied orbital, e.g. of X, by the amount A/(X). [Pg.228]

The effects of -conjugation between the Si=Si bond and adjacent aryl groups are rather weak even when the latter are not twisted to orthogonality. For instance, the nn transition, located near 345 nm in tetramethyldisilene, is shifted only to 420 nm in tetramesityldisilene18. This is presumably a reflection both of the reduced value of the C-Si resonance integral relative to C-C, and of the mismatch of the p-orbital energies. [Pg.1021]

LCAO, and the MO energies. To get numbers for H the SHM reduces all the Fock matrix elements to a (the coulomb integral, for AOs on the same atom) and (the bond integral or resonance integral, for AOs not on the same atom for nonadjacent atoms P is set = 0). To get actual numbers for the Fock elements, a and jS are defined as energies relative to a, in units of P this makes the Fock matrix consist of just Os and - Is, where the Os represent same-atom interactions and nonadjacent-atom interactions, and the -Is represent adjacent-atom interactions. The use of just two Fock elements is a big approximation. The SHM Fock matrix is easily written down just by looking at the way the atoms in the molecule are connected. Applications of the SHM include predicting ... [Pg.152]

Thus, formally, the change of the proton state is reduced to the change of the electron resonance integral, Vjf by V f S, All the temperature dependence of the transition probability for a fixed value of the coordinate of the reactant center of mass is related to the classical overcoming of the Franck-Condon barrier created by the solvent polarization. [Pg.21]


See other pages where Reduced resonance integral is mentioned: [Pg.51]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.556]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.1306]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.815]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.29 , Pg.30 ]




SEARCH



Integration, resonances

Reduced integration

Resonance integrals

© 2024 chempedia.info