Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Reaction phase-vanishing

An interesting apphcation of the unique possibilities inherent in fluorous chemistry is the phase-vanishing reactions reported by Ryu and co-workers.This strategy encompasses no fluorous reagents as such but uses a fluorous phase as a physical barrier for passive transport between an organic phase (hexane) and a reagent (BBrj) in brominations of alkenes. The completion of the reaction is easily monitored by the disappearance of the reagent. [Pg.43]

Using a glass U-tube as a reaction tool, Nakamura and coworkers expanded phase-vanishing methods to include reagents Hghter than fluorous solvents, such as thionyl chloride and phosphorus trichloride [19]. [Pg.227]

In general a nonlinear molecule with N atoms has three translational, three rotational, and 3N-6 vibrational degrees of freedom in the gas phase, which reduce to three frustrated vibrational modes, three frustrated rotational modes, and 3N-6 vibrational modes, minus the mode which is the reaction coordinate. For a linear molecule with N atoms there are three translational, two rotational, and 3N-5 vibrational degrees of freedom in the gas phase, and three frustrated vibrational modes, two frustrated rotational modes, and 3N-5 vibrational modes, minus the reaction coordinate, on the surface. Thus, the transition state for direct adsorption of a CO molecule consists of two frustrated translational modes, two frustrated rotational modes, and one vibrational mode. In this case the third frustrated translational mode vanishes since it is the reaction coordinate. More complex molecules may also have internal rotational levels, which further complicate the picture. It is beyond the scope of this book to treat such systems. [Pg.121]

Termolecular Reactions. If one attempts to extend the collision theory from the treatment of bimolecular gas phase reactions to termolecular processes, the problem of how to define a termolecular collision immediately arises. If such a collision is defined as the simultaneous contact of the spherical surfaces of all three molecules, one must recognize that two hard spheres will be in contact for only a very short time and that the probability that a third molecule would strike the other two during this period is vanishingly small. [Pg.109]

Interestingly enough, quantity Ha (Eq. 84) has a rather transparent probabilistic meaning. In fact, the growth of the terminal a-th type block of a macroradical may be over either by the transition of an active center into another phase, or by its vanishing due to the chain termination reaction. The probabilities of these events, coinciding with the probabilities that a block chosen at random will be either internal or external, are equal to Ha and 1 -Ha, respectively. [Pg.188]

Heterogeneous chemistry at a wall creates a further constraint on the initial conditions. At the inlet, the gas-phase composition, surface composition, and temperature must be specified such that they are consistent with the heterogeneous reaction mechanism. Specifically, the net surface production rates for each surface species must vanish i = 0 (Section 11.10). [Pg.324]

We will introduce basic kinetic concepts that are frequently used and illustrate them with pertinent examples. One of those concepts is the idea of dynamic equilibrium, as opposed to static (mechanical) equilibrium. Dynamic equilibrium at a phase boundary, for example, means that equal fluxes of particles are continuously crossing the boundary in both directions so that the (macroscopic) net flux is always zero. This concept enables us to understand the non-equilibrium state of a system as a monotonic deviation from the equilibrium state. Driven by the deviations from equilibrium of certain functions of state, a change in time for such a system can then be understood as the return to equilibrium. We can select these functions of state according to the imposed constraints. If the deviations from equilibrium are sufficiently small, the result falls within a linear theory of process rates. As long as the kinetic coefficients can be explained in terms of the dynamic equilibrium properties, the reaction rates are directly proportional to the deviations. The thermodynamic equilibrium state is chosen as the reference state in which the driving forces X, vanish, but not the random thermal motions of structure elements i. Therefore, systems which we wish to study kinetically must first be understood at equilibrium, where the SE fluxes vanish individually both in the interior of all phases and across phase boundaries. This concept will be worked out in Section 4.2.1 after fluxes of matter, charge, etc. have been introduced through the formalism of irreversible thermodynamics. [Pg.61]

Since every achiral substrate is eventually consumed a(t = oo) = 0 and all the reactions stop asymptotically, Eq. 39 tells us that the product rs should vanish. If there is more R than S initially, S monomer disappears ultimately, for instance. But S molecules do not disappear nor decompose back into achiral substrate. They are only incorporated into the heterodimer RS. The system is not determined solely by monomer concentrations r and s, (or (p and q ) but also depends on heterodimer concentration [.RS]. The flow takes place in a three-dimensional phase space of r, s, [RS], as shown in Fig. 5a. [Pg.109]

Simultaneous measurements of the rate of change, temperature and composition of the reacting fluid can be reliably carried out only in a reactor where gradients of temperature and/or composition of the fluid phase are absent or vanish in the limit of suitable operating conditions. The determination of specific quantities such as catalytic activity from observations on a reactor system where composition and temperature depend on position in the reactor requires that the distribution of reaction rate, temperature and compositions in the reactor are measured or obtained from a mathematical model, representing the interaction of chemical reaction, mass-transfer and heat-transfer in the reactor. The model and its underlying assumptions should be specified when specific rate parameters are obtained in this way. [Pg.542]


See other pages where Reaction phase-vanishing is mentioned: [Pg.36]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.400]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.688]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.478]    [Pg.539]    [Pg.542]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.544]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.125]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.43 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info