Reaction heat adsorption, types

Fuerstenau et al.35) mention an indirect method of determining the adsorption heat. According to this method, the adsorbed amount of a surfactant T is determined as a function of c (at a constant pH) at two or more different temperatures. According to the Clausius-CIapeyron type of Eq. 85 (in 4.2), the AHj is the same as the isosteric heat of adsorption Qa. For surfactants such as amines and sulfonates which do not chemically react with the solid, Qst is the heat of adsorption in the real sense of the word35. In contradiction to this type on interaction they mention a chemical reaction of a surfactant such as e.g. of xanthates or salicylaldehyde156) when metal-surfactant complexes are formed both on the surface and in the bulk phase. In these cases Q t is not the real heat of adsorption but represents an intermediate heat between the reaction heat and the adsorption heat. 

Irrespective of the nature of the reaction intermediate, enolic type (11) or surface carbide (12), the dechne of the turnover number for the zeolites with higher Si/Al ratio can be explained as follows. For platinum (13) and palladium (14,15) loaded zeolites, support effects are known to exist. The higher the acidity (and the oxidizing power) of the zeolite, the higher will be the electron-deficient character of the supported metal. It also is well established now (16) that the average acidity of hydrogen zeohtes increases with the Si/Al ratio. This explains why the electron deficient character of ruthenium should increase with the Si/Al ratio of the zeolite, and a stronger interaction with adsorbed CO should be expected. Vannice (19,20) reported that the N value for CH4 formation decreases when the heat of adsorption for CO increases. All this explains why the tmnover number of the methanation reaction over ruthenium decreases when the Si/Al ratio of the zeolite support increases. 

Such a model should be as simple as possible, without however missing any of the underlying thermodynamic and physicochemical factors which cause electrochemical promotion. In particular it will be shown that even the use of Langmuir-type adsorption isotherms, appropriately modified due to the application of potential (or equivalently by the presense of promoters) suffice to describe all the experimentally observed rules G1 to G7 as well as practically all other observations regarding electrochemical promotion including the effect of potential on heats of adsorption as well as on kinetics and reaction orders. 

CO oxidation is often quoted as a structure-insensitive reaction, implying that the turnover frequency on a certain metal is the same for every type of site, or for every crystallographic surface plane. Figure 10.7 shows that the rates on Rh(lll) and Rh(llO) are indeed similar on the low-temperature side of the maximum, but that they differ at higher temperatures. This is because on the low-temperature side the surface is mainly covered by CO. Hence the rate at which the reaction produces CO2 becomes determined by the probability that CO desorbs to release sites for the oxygen. As the heats of adsorption of CO on the two surfaces are very similar, the resulting rates for CO oxidation are very similar for the two surfaces. However, at temperatures where the CO adsorption-desorption equilibrium lies more towards the gas phase, the surface reaction between O and CO determines the rate, and here the two rhodium surfaces show a difference (Fig. 10.7). The apparent structure insensitivity of the CO oxidation appears to be a coincidence that is not necessarily caused by equality of sites or ensembles thereof on the different surfaces. 

A survey of the literature shows that although very different calorimeters or microcalorimeters have been used for measuring heats of adsorption, most of them were of the adiabatic type, only a few were isothermal, and until recently (14, 15), none were typical heat-flow calorimeters. This results probably from the fact that heat-flow calorimetry was developed more recently than isothermal or adiabatic calorimetry (16, 17). We believe, however, from our experience, that heat-flow calorimeters present, for the measurement of heats of adsorption, qualities and advantages which are not met by other calorimeters. Without entering, at this point, upon a discussion of the respective merits of different adsorption calorimeters, let us indicate briefly that heat-flow calorimeters are particularly adapted to the investigation (1) of slow adsorption or reaction processes, (2) at moderate or high temperatures, and (3) on solids which present a poor thermal diffusivity. Heat-flow calorimetry appears thus to allow the study of adsorption or reaction processes which cannot be studied conveniently with the usual adiabatic or pseudoadiabatic, adsorption calorimeters. In this respect, heat-flow calorimetry should be considered, actually, as a new tool in adsorption and heterogeneous catalysis research. 

It is true, however, that many catalytic reactions cannot be studied conveniently, under given conditions, with usual adsorption calorimeters of the isoperibol type, either because the catalyst is a poor heat-conducting material or because the reaction rate is too low. The use of heat-flow calorimeters, as has been shown in the previous sections of this article, does not present such limitations, and for this reason, these calorimeters are particularly suitable not only for the study of adsorption processes but also for more complete investigations of reaction mechanisms at the surface of oxides or oxide-supported metals. The aim of this section is therefore to present a comprehensive picture of the possibilities and limitations of heat-flow calorimetry in heterogeneous catalysis. The use of Calvet microcalorimeters in the study of a particular system (the oxidation of carbon monoxide at the surface of divided nickel oxides) has moreover been reviewed in a recent article of this series (19). 

The reactions take place only in active catalytic layer, the rates Rj are considered individually for each type of the converter (DOC, SCR, NSRC, TWC). The development of suitable reaction schemes and the evaluation of kinetic parameters are discussed generally in Section IV. The details for DOC, NSRC and SCR of NOx by NH3 are given in Sections V, VI and VII, respectively. The important species deposited on the catalyst surface are balanced (e.g. HC adsorption in DOC, oxygen and NOx storage in NSRC, NH3 adsorption in SCR). Heat transfer by radiation and homogeneous reactions... 

As we found in an earlier section, there is one type of catalytic reaction in which the observed heat of activation does not require correction for the changing adsorption of the reactant, namely, reactions of zero order. In these the surface of the catalyst is completely covered with adsorbed molecules, and, so long as increase... 

Vapor-phase alkylation of benzene by ethene and propene over HY, LaY, and REHY has been studied in a tubular flow reactor. Transient data were obtained. The observed rate of reaction passes through a maximum with time, which results from build-up of product concentration in the zeolite pores coupled with catalyst deactivation. The rate decay is related to aromatic olefin ratio temperature, and olefin type. The observed rate fits a model involving desorption of product from the zeolite crystallites into the gas phase as a rate-limiting step. The activation energy for the desorption term is 16.5 heal/mole, approximately equivalent to the heat of adsorption of ethylbenzene. For low molecular weight alkylates intracrystalline diffusion limitations do not exist. 

Hydrogen evolution is the only reaction for which a complete theory of electrocatalysis has been developed [33]. The reason is that the reaction proceeds through a limited number of steps with possibly only one type of intermediate. The theory predicts that the electrocatalytic activity depends on the heat of adsorption of the intermediate on the electrode surface in a way giving rise to the well known volcano curve. The prediction has been verified experimentally [54] (Fig. 2) and the volcano curve remains the main predictive basis on which the catalytic activity is discussed [41, 55],... 

---