Reaction center model, improvement

The three dimensional structure of the reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26 and 2.4.1 has been reported at a resolution of 2.8 A and 3.0 A respectively (1-4). To improve the accuracy of these models we have futher refined the R-26 data using molecular dynamics methods. We have also collected diffraction data at higher resolution for RCs from the 2.4.1 strain. To relate the three dimensional structure to its function, we are performing various studies on RCs with modified structures (altered amino acid composition, cofactors removed, with herbicide bound). We describe the structure of RCs containing only the primary quinone and the structure of RCs with the herbicide, terbutryn, bound. Progress in crystallizing and determining the structures of other modified RCs is also reported. 

Using this strategy, four gold(III) porphyrins have been assembled into a single cluster [17], This tetrameric array shows interesting photochemical behavior and appears to be an improved model for photosynthetic reaction center complexes since it combines the features of exciton annihilation and light-induced electron transfer. Below, we contrast the photochemistry of the bis- and tetrakis- complexes. 

Bone defects surgically produced in sheep and rabbit models, have been treated with freeze dried methylpyrrohdinone chitosan [334-336]. hi view of improving bone tissue reconstitution with chitosan associated with calcium phosphate. Microscopic and histological analyses showed the presence of an osteogenic reaction moving from the rim of the surgical lesion toward the center. In control lesions, dense fibrous tissue, without the characteristic histoarchitecture of bone was observed. 

A two levels of full factorial experimental design with three independent variables were generated with one center point, which was repeated[3]. In this design, F/P molar ratio, Oh/P wt%, and reaction temperature were defined as independent variables, all receiving two values, a high and a low value. A cube like model was formed, with eight comers. One center point (repeated twice) was added to improve accuracy of the design. Every analysis results were treated as a dependent result in the statistical study. 

The proper treatment of the electronic subtleties at the metal center is not the only challenge for computational modeling of homogeneous catalysis. So far in this chapter we have focused exclusively in the energy variation of the catalyst/substrate complex throughout the catalytic cycle. This would be an exact model of reality if reactions were carried out in gas phase and at 0 K. Since this is conspicously not the common case, there is a whole area of improvement consisting in introducing environment and temperature effects. 

Figure 12 shows the reaction profile for the hydrosilylation process involving the most stable fi3-sily 1-ally 1 complex, 10a-anti, calculated with model B. Examination of the reaction profile suggests that the rate determining step of the catalytic cycle is the reductive elimination. More specifically, the transfer of the silyl moiety to the (J-carbon of the styrene. Since recoordination of the pyrazole ligand occurs in this step, it is possible that enhancement of this ligands ability to recombined with the Pd center may lead to improved activities. 

---