Radiocarbon dating complications

Uncertainties, Limitations, and Complications in Radiocarbon Dating. Discrepancies between a measured radiocarbon age and the otherwise verified age of certain specimens are sometime found. These discrepancies are due to deviations from the basic assumptions on which the radiocarbon method rests, which are essentially, as follows ... 

A mass of evidence seems to confirm that the mixing rate of radiocarbon in the atmosphere is rapid, and that with respect to its radiocarbon content the atmosphere can be considered as a homogeneous entirety. The contamination of samples with matter from an extraneous source can nevertheless invalidate this assumption. Two types of contamination can be differentiated physicochemical contamination and mechanical intrusion. There are two forms of physicochemical contamination. One is due to the dilution of the concentration of radiocarbon in the atmosphere by very old carbon, practically depleted of radiocarbon, released by the combustion of fossil fuel, such as coal and oil. The other is by the contamination with radiocarbon produced by nuclear bomb tests during the 1950s and later in the twentieth century. The uncertainties introduced by these forms of contamination complicate the interpretation of data obtained by the radiocarbon dating method and restrict its accuracy and the effective time range of dating. 

If it can be assumed that the rate of production has not varied over time, and thus that a dynamic equilibrium has formed, and if it is possible to extract clean sample carbon, unaltered apart from the decline in and to measure its current concentration, it is possible using eqn [1] to calculate the elapsed time since the death of the organism. In practice, the process is far more complicated than this brief description indicates. Principally, one of the basic assumptions, that the rate of formation is constant, is known to be incorrect. The rate has, in fact, varied over time in response to a number of effects, principally fluctuations in the cosmic-ray flux with changes in the geomagnetic field and in solar activity. Because of this, no radiocarbon measurement equates directly with a calendar date, and all such measurements must be calibrated before use. 

---