Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Quasi random

Fig. 4. A schematic two-dimensional illustration of the idea for an information theory model of hydrophobic hydration. Direct insertion of a solute of substantial size (the larger circle) will be impractical. For smaller solutes (the smaller circles) the situation is tractable a successful insertion is found, for example, in the upper panel on the right. For either the small or the large solute, statistical information can be collected that leads to reasonable but approximate models of the hydration free energy, Eq. (7). An important issue is that the solvent configurations (here, the point sets) are supplied by simulation or X-ray or neutron scattering experiments. Therefore, solvent structural assumptions can be avoided to some degree. The point set for the upper panel is obtained by pseudo-random-number generation so the correct inference would be of a Poisson distribution of points and = kTpv where v is the van der Waals volume of the solute. Quasi-random series were used for the bottom panel so those inferences should be different. See Pratt et al. (1999). Fig. 4. A schematic two-dimensional illustration of the idea for an information theory model of hydrophobic hydration. Direct insertion of a solute of substantial size (the larger circle) will be impractical. For smaller solutes (the smaller circles) the situation is tractable a successful insertion is found, for example, in the upper panel on the right. For either the small or the large solute, statistical information can be collected that leads to reasonable but approximate models of the hydration free energy, Eq. (7). An important issue is that the solvent configurations (here, the point sets) are supplied by simulation or X-ray or neutron scattering experiments. Therefore, solvent structural assumptions can be avoided to some degree. The point set for the upper panel is obtained by pseudo-random-number generation so the correct inference would be of a Poisson distribution of points and = kTpv where v is the van der Waals volume of the solute. Quasi-random series were used for the bottom panel so those inferences should be different. See Pratt et al. (1999).
The behaviour of the correlation function X% (r, t) is defined by the auto-catalytic reaction stage the probability to find some particle B near another B is rather high if they are reproduced by a division. For the short relative distances r the function X% (r,t) has a singularity which is, however, weakly pronounced, i.e., particles B are quasi-randomly distributed in space. For a chosen parameter k = 0.02 the relative diffusion coefficients is large Db =2(1 - k), Db Dp,. The aggregates emerging under reproduction of B s are spread out rapidly due to the diffusion. [Pg.509]

In Fig. 8.14 particles B are distributed quasi-randomly, Xs(r,t) > 1 only at r 1. The distinctive sizes of the aggregates of A s are of the order of several trapping radii, L 1. Aggregates of A s have small amount of B s since on their boundaries the correlation function of dissimilar reactants Y(r,t) 1. [Pg.511]

The spatial distribution of flashes can be a significant factor in lightning problems. The fact that consecutive flashes are well separated, often quasi-randomly, is familiar to any careful observer of thunderstorms. Nevertheless, the erroneous concept that the discharges progress in a steady orderly pattern is still prevalent. [Pg.102]

Current experiments uniformly tend to perform a grid search on the composition and noncomposition variables. It is preferable, however, to choose the variables statistically from the allowed values. It is also possible to consider choosing the variables in a fashion that attempts to maximize the amount of information gained from the limited number of samples screened, via a quasi-random, low-discrepancy sequence (Niederreiter, 1992 Bratley et al., 1994). Such sequences attempt to eliminate the redundancy that naturally occurs when a space is searched statistically, and they have several favorable theoretical properties. An illustration of these three approaches to materials discovery library design is shown in Fig. 1. [Pg.88]

The spacing for each component of the noncomposition variables is C = For the LDS method, different quasi-random sequences are... [Pg.98]

The velocity varies in an irregular pattern, a characteristic signature of turbulence. This quasi-randomness is what makes turbulence different from other motions, like waves. [Pg.103]

Also the high-field magnetization behaviour of these two materials is different. In the case of URuGa a perfect Unear M versus B dependence in fields up to 35 T was found at 4.2 K and 1.4 K. In URuAl, on the other hand, a considerable deviation from linearity (upturn) was observed. If one compares the results on quasi-random-oriented powders obtained by fixing in frozen alcohol with the results obtained on... [Pg.423]

Note that Eq. (5.3) gives a deterministic error bound for integration because V(f) depends only on the nature of the function. Similarly, the discrepancy of a point set is a purely geometric property of that point set. When given a numerical quadrature problem, we must cope with whatever function we are given, it is really only the points, x(, that we control. Thus one approach to efficient integration is to seek point sets with small discrepancies. Such sets are necessarily not random but are instead referred to as quasi-random numbers (QRNs). [Pg.32]

This gives us a target to aim at for the construction of low-discrepancy point sets (quasi-random numbers). For comparison, the estimated error with random sequences is... [Pg.33]

The quantity in brackets, the variance, only depends on / Hence the standard deviation of the Monte Carlo estimate is 0(N 1/2). This is much worse than the bounds of Eq. (5.5) as a function of the number of points. It is this fact that has motivated the search for quasi-random points. [Pg.33]

We will now present a very brief description of quasi-random sequences. Those interested in a much more detailed review of the subject are encouraged to consult the recent work of Niederreiter [25]. An example of a onedimensional set of quasi-random numbers is the van der Corput sequence. First we choose a base, b, and write an integer n in base b as n = 2 " a, b . Then we define the van der Corput sequence as x = = " 1 1. For base b = 3, the first 12 terms of the van der Corput sequence are... [Pg.33]


See other pages where Quasi random is mentioned: [Pg.387]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.457]    [Pg.424]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.2361]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.837]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.31]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.317 ]




SEARCH



Quasi random systems

Quasi-Equilibrium Treatment of Random Reactions

Quasi-random numbers

Quasi-random structures

Quasi-random-walk distribution

© 2024 chempedia.info