Quantum distributions tunneling

In Chapter 7 general kinetics of electrode reactions is presented with kinetic parameters such as stoichiometric number, reaction order, and activation energy. In most cases the affinity of reactions is distributed in multiple steps rather than in a single particular rate step. Chapter 8 discusses the kinetics of electron transfer reactions across the electrode interfaces. Electron transfer proceeds through a quantum mechanical tunneling from an occupied electron level to a vacant electron level. Complexation and adsorption of redox particles influence the rate of electron transfer by shifting the electron level of redox particles. Chapter 9 discusses the kinetics of ion transfer reactions which are based upon activation processes of Boltzmann particles. 

The wave functions for u = 0 to 4 are plotted in figure 6.20 the point where the function crosses through zero is called a node, and we note that the wave function for level v has v nodes. The probability density distribution for each vibrational level is shown in figure 6.21, and the difference between quantum and classical behaviour is a notable feature of this diagram. For example, in the v = 0 level the probability is a maximum at y = 0, whereas for a classical harmonic oscillator it would be a minimum at v = 0, with maxima at the classical turning points. Furthermore the probability density is small but finite outside the classical region, a phenomenon known as quantum mechanical tunnelling. 

Baugher, A. H., Kossler, W. J., and Petzinger, K. G., Does quantum mechanical tunneling affect the validity of hole volume distributions obtained from positron annihilation lifetime measurements Macromolecules, 29, 7280-7283 (1996). 

This relation may be interpreted as the mean-square amplitude of a quantum harmonic oscillator 3 o ) = 2mco) h coth( /iLorentzian distribution of the system s normal modes. In the absence of friction (2.27) describes thermally activated as well as tunneling processes when < 1, or fhcoo > 1, respectively. At first glance it may seem surprising... 

The STM postulated tunneling matrix element distribution P(A) oc 1 /A implies a weakly (logarithmically) time-dependent heat capacity. This was pointed out early on by Anderson et al. [8], while the first specific estimate appeared soon afterwards [93]. The heat capacity did indeed turn out time dependent however, its experimental measures are indirect, and so a detailed comparison with theory is difficult. Reviews on the subject can be found in Nittke et al. [99] and Pohl [95]. Here we discuss the A distribution dictated by the present theory, in the semiclassical limit, and evaluate the resulting time dependence of the specific heat. While this limit is adequate at long times, quantum effects are important at short times (this concerns the heat condictivity as well). The latter are discussed in Section VA. 

The coefficient of the 8-function reflects the pile-up of the two-level systems that would have had a value of e < S were it not for quantum effects. These fast two-level systems will contribute to the short-time value of the heat capacity in glasses. The precise distribution in Eq. (69) was only derived within perturbation theory and so is expected to provide only a crude description of the interplay of clasical and quantum effects in forming low-barrier TLS. Quantitative discrepancies from the simple perturbative distribution may be expected owing to the finite size of a tunneling mosaic cell, as mentioned earlier. 

In this case the preparation of the barrier is performed mainly by the quantum fluctuations of the tunneling particle in the transverse direction. Note that the width of the distribution here is l/ /2 of that in the distribution function for the coordinates qp. This is due to the fact that in this case the fluctuations of the particle are of quantum character and a coherent averaging of the resonance... 

---