Quantum corrections magnitude

Figure C3.5.6 compares the result of this ansatz to the numerical result from the Wiener-Kliintchine theorem. They agree well and the ansatz exliibits the expected exponential energy-gap law (VER rate decreases exponentially with Q). The ansatz was used to detennine the VER rate with no quantum correction Q= 1), with the Bader-Beme hannonic correction [61] and with a correction based [83, M] on Egelstaff s method [62]. The Egelstaff corrected results were within a factor of five of experiment, whereas other corrections were off by orders of magnitude. This calculation represents the present state of the art in computing VER rates in such difficult systems, inasmuch as the authors used only a model potential and no adjustable parameters. However the ansatz procedure is clearly not extendible to polyatomic molecules or to diatomic molecules in polyatomic solvents.

For example, the rate constant of the collinear reaction H -f- H2 has been calculated in the temperature interval 200-1000 K. The quantum correction factor, i.e., the ratio of the actual rate constant to that given by CLTST, has been found to reach 50 at T = 200 K. However, in the reactions that we regard as low-temperature ones, this factor may be as large as ten orders of magnitude (see introduction). That is why the present state of affairs in QTST, which is well suited for flnding quantum contributions to gas-phase rate constants, does not presently allow one to use it as a numerical tool to study complex low-temperature conversions, at least without further approximations such as the WKB one. ... 

Further improvements to the theory require the incorporation of quantum factors such as exchange effects,42 although, even then, the theory still fails to predict the correct magnitude of the cross section for several fairly simple atoms such as Ne, N, and F. 

The interaction-energy contribution to the quantum correction is larger in magnitude than the free energy contribution, suggesting the entropic part is positive. 

Spin does not appear in the Schrodinger treatment, and essentially has to be postulated. There are more sophisticated versions of quantum theory where electron spin appears naturally, and where the magnetic dipole appears with the correct magnitude. I want to spend time discussing electron spin in more detail, before moving to the topic of electron spin resonance. 

How to proceed with these matrix elements will depend upon which property one wishes to estimate. Let us begin by discussing the effect of the pseudopotential as a cause of diffraction by the electrons this leads to the nearly-free-electron approximation. The relation of this description to the description of the electronic structure used for other systems will be seen. We shall then compute the screening of the pseudopotential, which is necessary to obtain correct magnitudes for the form factors, and then use quantum-mechanical perturbation theory to calculate electron scattering by defects and the changes in energy that accompany distortion of the lattice. 

One may say, perhaps, that some factor must still be introduced in the theoretical expression to obtain the correct magnitude of 6 and the experimental observations offer a means of evaluating this. But, unfortunately, the theoretical probabilities do not have even the right relative values. They decrease with quantum number while for the experimental values Tolman and Badger found a decided increase. The absolute values which they calculated may be in error for the reasons given above, but more perfect resolution would be expected to increase the trend they observed rather than to eliminate it. It would seem, therefore, that the predictions of the new quantum theory, while they may apply to some ideal system, do not describe the conditions we have experimentally observed in the case of hydrogen chloride. 

The SAPT method has recently been used to compute the complete six-dimensional water dimer potential. A global elaborate analytic potential has been fitted to about 1000 points. This potential has been used to compute the second virial coefficient for water. Results are presented in Figure 2. As one can see, the SAPT potential reproduces the experimental data very accurately. Compared to the popular empirical potentials as well as to the MCY ab initio potential the SAPT values are nearly an order of magnitude more accurate. Notice that the virial coefficients computed from the empirical potentials do not include quantum corrections but these are not important at this level of accuracy. The recent polarizable point charge (PPC) potential of Ref. 176, which gives the best virial coefficient of all empirical potentials, has to a lesser extent the effective character typical of bulk empirical potentials as it models explicitly the nonadditive induction energy. Thus, the pairwise additive component is less biased by efforts to mimic nonadditive forces. 

We may use the method we have summarized in 2 of Ch. XVIII to obtain the order of magnitude of small quantum corrections for... 

The leading correction to the classical ideal gas pressure temi due to quantum statistics is proportional to 1 and to n. The correction at constant density is larger in magnitude at lower temperatures and lighter mass. The coefficient of can be viewed as an effective second virial coefficient The effect of quantum... 

---