Quantizing non-adiabatic coupling

A. The Quantization of the Non-Adiabatic Coupling Matrix Along a Closed Path... 

We concentrate on an adiabatic tri-state model in order to derive the quantization conditions to be fulfilled by the eigenvalues of the non-adiabatic coupling matrix and finally present the extended BO equation. The starting point is the 3x3 non-adiabatic coupling matrix,... 

The next question asked is whether there are any indications, from ab initio calculations, to the fact that the non-adiabatic transfonnation angles have this feature. Indeed such a study, related to the H3 system, was reported a few years ago [64]. However, it was done for circular contours with exceptionally small radii (at most a few tenths of an atomic unit). Similar studies, for circular and noncircular contours of much larger radii (sometimes up to five atomic units and more) were done for several systems showing that this feature holds for much more general situations [11,12,74]. As a result of the numerous numerical studies on this subject [11,12,64-75] the quantization of a quasi-isolated two-state non-adiabatic coupling term can be considered as established for realistic systems. 

In this section, we intend to show that for a certain type of models the above imposed restrictions become the ordinary well-known Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization conditions [82]. For this purpose, we consider the following non-adiabatic coupling matrix x ... 

In our introductory remarks, we said that this section would be devoted to model systems. Nevertheless it is important to emphasize that although this case is treated within a group of model systems this model stands for the general case of a two-state sub-Hilbert space. Moreover, this is the only case for which we can show, analytically, for a nonmodel system, that the restrictions on the D matrix indeed lead to a quantization of the relevant non-adiabatic coupling term. 

The three matrices of interest were already derived and presented in Section V.A. There they were termed the D (topological) matrices (not related to the above mentioned Wigner matrix) and were used to show the kind of quantization one should expect for the relevant non-adiabatic coupling terms. The only difference between these topological mauices and the... 

In other words, the quantization that was encountered for the non-adiabatic coupling terms is associated with the quantization of the intensity of the magnetic field along the seam. Moreover, Eq. (154) reveals another feature, namely, that there are fields for which n is an odd integer, namely, conical intersections and there are fields for which is an even integer, namely, parabolical intersections. 

In Section IV, we introduced the topological matrix D [see Eq. (38)] and showed that for a sub-Hilbert space this matrix is diagonal with (-1-1) and (—1) terms a feature that was defined as quantization of the non-adiabatic coupling matrix. If the present three-state system forms a sub-Hilbert space the resulting D matrix has to be a diagonal matrix as just mentioned. From Eq. (38) it is noticed that the D matrix is calculated along contours, F, that surround conical intersections. Our task in this section is to calculate the D matrix and we do this, again, for circular contours. 

---