Quantitative treatment of metal binding

In order to quantify the various degrees of tightness in binding (which vary between wide limits), stability constants are used. These are the constants governing the mass-action equilibrium between the ligand (s) and one ion of the metal. Thus for the 1 1 complex of glycine and cupric ion, the equilibrium is  

Potentiometry can be used even for dilute solutions of sparingly soluble substances if unusual care is taken e.g. 0.1 mM adenine, titrated in the presence of 8 /jlM cupric ions (in water), readily gave a precise constant (Albert and Serjeant, 1960). Solvents other than water should never be used if results of biological significance are required. Mixtures of water and an organic solvent give particularly misleading results (Albert and Serjeant, 1984). 

It was not possible to calculate stability constants from titration data until Bjerrum (1941) showed that they are related to two variables (w) and [L] by the following equation  

The values of [L] and n change progressively during the titration, and are calculated as follows  

A simple view of what is happening during a titration is that the addition of alkali removes more and more hydrogen cations from the chelating agent, and these are replaced by metal cations. But, as the above equations indicate, the relationship is not a linear one. 

---

This Eq. 2.4 displayed by Eig. 2.2 and rearrangements thereof will return throughout this book as it is crucial to estimate binding properties, including dynamic features of metal ion catalysis, from the enviromnent/ substrate of some metal ion and a quantitative treatment of the properties of the latter. 

The above examples show the general features of ion adsorption on phyUosili-cates, which can be applied also to other silicate minerals the involvement of edge groups, mainly aluminol, in the coordination with metal cations, and in the development of positive charges favoring anion binding. The quantitative treatment of these phenomena will be presented in Part HI. 

We have considered only some of the possibilities for complexing. The phosphate groups present in many molecules also bind metal ions. Much of the Ca and Mg of normal blood is so bound up. The lack of formation constants prevents a quantitative treatment of any one metal ion. However, one can make some approximations, as for the Hg case, which are far better than assuming that the total analytical concentration of the metal in blood is present as its aquo ion. 

The determination of the metal concentration (excess or deficiency) compared to normal tissue, the binding to proteins and the quantitative distribution of metals in brain tissues is of the highest significance for the study and treatment of neurodegenerative diseases and is linked to the development of mass spectrometric techniques on biological complex systems. 

Simple steady-state models may be used in order to relate quantitatively the mean concentration in the lake water column and the residence time of metal ions to the removal rate by sedimentation (for a detailed treatment of lake models see Imboden and Schwarzenbach, 1985). In a simple steady-state model, the inputs to the lake equal the removal by sedimentation and by outflow the water column is considered as fully mixed mean concentrations and residence times in the water column can be derived from the measured sedimentation fluxes. The binding of metals to the particles is fast in comparison to the settling. 

Off the main stream of this research were calculations of the binding energies in the growth of crystal nuclei from metallic atoms (1933) and the theoretical treatment of chemical reactions produced by ionization processes (1936), notably the ortho-para hydrogen conversion by a-particles and the radiochemical synthesis and decomposition of hydrogen bromide. In this it was shown that the concept of ion clusters in such reactions was unnecessary and that quantitative calculations of reaction rates could be secured without such an assumption. 

To establish a quantitative relation between F and G for the entire tip and the entire sample, we have to consider all the states in the tip and the sample. A rigorous treatment is complicated. The following treatment is based on the approximate additivity of atomic force and tunneling conductance with respect to the atoms of the tip. In other words, the force between the entire tip and the sample can be approximated as the sum of the force between the individual atoms in the tip and the entire sample, so does tunneling conductivity. Because the tip is made of transition metals, for example, W, Pt, and Ir, the tight-binding approximation, and consequently, additivity, are reasonable assumptions. Under this approximation, the total force is... 

---