QCISD approximation

An infinite-order correction is similarly made to MP4 or QCISD(T) energies (approximate full Cl energies) ... 

It has later been shown that the resulting equations are identical to CCSD where some of the terms have been omitted. The omitted terms are computationally inexpensive, and there appears to be no reason for using the less complete QCISD over CCSD (or QCISD(T) in place of CCSD(T)), although in practice they normally give very similar results. There are a few other methods which may be considered either as CISD with addition of extra terms to make them approximately size extensive, or as approximate versions of CCSD. Some of the methods falling into this category are Averaged... 

There have been a number of computational studies of the epoxidation reaction. These studies have generally found that the hydrogen-bonded peroxy acid is approximately perpendicular to the axis of the double bond, giving a spiro structure.75 Figure 12.8 shows TS structures and Ea values based on B3LYP/6-31G computations. The Ea trend is as expected for an electrophilic process OCH3 < CH3 CH = CH2 < H < CN. Similar trends were found in MP4/6-31G and QCISD/6-31G computations. 

The final total energy is effectively at the QCISD(T,fu)/G3Large level if the additivity approximations used work well. The validity of... 

There is also a hierarchy of electron correlation procedures. The Hartree-Fock (HF) approximation neglects correlation of electrons with antiparallel spins. Increasing levels of accuracy of electron correlation treatment are achieved by Mpller-Plesset perturbation theory truncated at the second (MP2), third (MP3), or fourth (MP4) order. Further inclusion of electron correlation is achieved by methods such as quadratic configuration interaction with single, double, and (perturbatively calculated) triple excitations [QCISD(T)], and by the analogous coupled cluster theory [CCSD(T)] [8],... 

These single reference-based methods are limited to cases where the reference function can be written as a single determinant. This is most often not the case and it is then necessary to use a multiconfigurational approach. Multrreference Cl can possibly be used, but this method is only approximately size extensive, which may lead to large errors unless an extended reference space is used. For example, Osanai et al. [8] obtained for the excitation energy in Mn 2.24 eV with the QCISD(T) method while SDCI with cluster corrections gave 2.64 eV. Extended basis sets were used. The experimental value is 2.15 eV. 

The final total energy is effectively at the QCISD(T,FULL)/G3Large level if the different additivity approximations work well. The average absolute deviation from experiment of G3 theory for the G2/97 test set is 1.01 kcal/mol (see Table 5). For the subset of 148 neutral enthalpies of formation the average absolute deviation is 0.93 kcal/mol. The corresponding deviations for G2 theory are 1.49 and 1.56 kcal/mol, respectively. The improvement over G2 theory is shown in Figure 3 for different types of molecule in the G2/97 test set. 

Instead of the very demanding CCSDT calculations one often performs CCSD (T) (note the parentheses), in which the contribution of triple excitations is represented in an approximate way (not refined iteratively) this could be called coupled cluster approximate (or perturbative) triples. The quadratic configuration method (QCI) is very similar to the CC method. The most accurate implementation of this in common use is QCISD(T) (quadratic Cl singles, doubles, triples, with triple excitations treated in an approximate, non-iterative way). The CC method, which is usually only moderately slower than QCI (Table 5.6), is apparently better [102]. CCSD(T) calculations are, generally speaking, the current benchmark for practical molecular calculations on molecules of up to moderate size. 

The structural parameters and vibrational frequencies of three selected examples, namely, H2O, O2F2, and B2H6, are summarized in Tables 5.6.1 to 5.6.3, respectively. Experimental results are also included for easy comparison. In each table, the structural parameters are optimized at ten theoretical levels, ranging from the fairly routine HF/6-31G(d) to the relatively sophisticated QCISD(T)/6-31G(d). In passing, it is noted that, in the last six correlation methods employed, CISD(FC), CCSD(FC),..., QCISD(T)(FC), FC denotes the frozen core approximation. In this approximation, only the correlation energy associated with the valence electrons is calculated. In other words, excitations out of the inner shell (core) orbitals of the molecule are not considered. The basis of this approximation is that the most significant chemical changes occur in the valence orbitals and the core orbitals remain essentially intact. On... 

G2(MP2, SVP) is an approximation scheme for obtaining correct total energies using QCISD(T) and MP2 calculations. For details see Reference 178. 

There have been a number of correction algorithms formulated over the years to help improve this size consistency problem but they do not entirely resolve it °. Another means of introducing size consistency is by a quadratic approximation, QCISD. The approach achieves this size consistency by sacrificing its variational character. It can be considered as a simplified approximate form of CCSD (see below) the method may cease to remain size consistent on going to higher levels of substitution. ... 

The QCISD projection equations differ from the equivalent CISD equations only in the addition of the quadratic terms CiC2 and C%, which lead to size-extensive energies. Alternatively, the QCISD equations may be considered an approximation to CCSD in which certain terms have been neglected. Pople and co-workers show how to extend this approach to include triples fully (QCISDT) or perturbatively [QCISD(T)].118... 

---