Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Pseudopotentials transferability problem

One way to reduce the computational cost of DFT (or WFT) calculations is to recognize that the core electrons of an atom have only an indirect influence on the atom chemistry. It thus makes sense to look for ways to precompute the atomic cores, essentially factoring them out of the larger electronic structure problem. The simplest way to do this is to freeze the core electrons, or to not allow their density to vary from that of a reference atom. This frozen core approach is generally more computationally efficient. One class of frozen core methods is the pseudopotential (PP) approach. The pseudopotential replaces the core electrons with an effective atom-centered potential that represents their influence on valence electrons and allows relativistic effects important to the core electrons to be incorporated. The advent of ultrasoft pseudopotentials (US-PPs) [18] enabled the explosion in supercell DFT calculations we have seen over the last 15 years. The projector-augmented wave (PAW) [19] is a less empirical and more accurate and transferable approach to partitioning the relativistic core and valence electrons and is also widely used today. Both the PP and PAW approaches require careful parameterizations of each atom type. [Pg.117]


See other pages where Pseudopotentials transferability problem is mentioned: [Pg.148]    [Pg.2210]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.2210]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.682]    [Pg.72]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.142 , Pg.148 ]




SEARCH



Pseudopotential

Pseudopotentials

© 2024 chempedia.info