Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Protons relative size

There are two other important consequences of spin-spin coupling. First, n equivalent protons will split another signal into n + 1 lines (hence three methyl protons split a methylene CH2 into 3 + 1 = 4 lines). Second, the relative sizes of peaks of a coupled multiplet can be calculated from Pascal s triangle (Figure 1.5). [Pg.10]

It is the tertiary amides that tend to be the most problematic in terms of proton NMR. They usually exhibit two rotametric forms, the relative proportion of each being determined by both electronic factors and by the relative sizes of the two groups, R1 and R2. Note this in no way implies that the rotameric forms of a tertiary amide could ever be physically separated as the inter-conversion rate between the two forms is generally in the order of seconds. A 50/50 ratio of rotamers is only guaranteed where R =R2 (as in the case of a primary amide where R1=R2=H). Consider the two compounds in Structures 6.14 and 6.15. [Pg.80]

The small size of the proton relative to its charge makes the proton very effective in polarizing the molecules in its immediate vicinity and consequently leads to a very high degree of solvation in a polar solvent. In aqueous solutions, the primary solvation process involves the formation of a covalent bond with the oxygen atom of a water molecule to form a hydronium ion H30 +. Secondary solvation of this species then occurs by additional water molecules. Whenever we use the term hydrogen ion in the future, we are referring to the HsO + species. [Pg.221]

It was recognized by La Mer and Noonan (1939 Noonan and La Mer, 1939) that the comparison of chemical processes in isotopically different solvents involves a general medium or transfer effect, in addition to any effect due to the occurrence of exchange equilibria. The point was further developed by Kingerley and La Mer (1941) in relation to acid-base equilibria, but these authors also showed that in many cases the transfer contribution is of minor importance. Because of the relative size of the two contributions, most workers have paid little or no attention to the transfer contribution. Precisely the opposite view, namely that the entire or, at least, a large part of the solvent isotope effect on proton transfer processes was due to the transfer effect, was propounded by Long and his group (Halevi et al., 1961) but has been abandoned in their more recent work. [Pg.287]

In section 2.1, you learned that the size of a typical atom is about 10-10 m. You know, however, that the atoms of each element are distinctly different. For example, the atoms of different elements have different numbers of protons. This means, of course, that they also have different numbers of electrons. You might predict that the size of an atom is related to the number of protons and electrons it has. Is there evidence to support this prediction If so, is there a pattern that can help you predict the relative size of an atom for any element in the periodic table ... [Pg.49]

Knowing the information just presented, we can now predict the relative size of the atoms and ions presented. Because they all have 18 electrons we can look at the number of protons present as well. The ion with the greatest number of protons, Ca, will have the smallest radius because it has the greatest nuclear pull on the 18 electrons. Sulfur, with just 16 protons, will have the least nuclear attraction for the 18 electrons that it has. This helps explain why non-metal atoms are smaller than their respective ions. Just the same, it also explains why metal atoms are larger than their respective ions. [Pg.73]

In these condensation reactions, the relative size of macrocycles could be varied by simply changing the length of the linking chain. Specifically, the effect that the changes in the macrocycle size have upon the deshielding of the internal protons were investigated by the preparation of a series of non-conjugated ketones [150],... [Pg.226]

To predict how changes in the nnmbers of protons, electrons, or both affect the size of the resnlting atom or ion, and to dednce the relative sizes of atoms from their positions in the periodic table... [Pg.364]

Make a table of the number of protons, the number of electrons, and the relative sizes for each of the following parts ... [Pg.384]

One trend worth noting involves the relative sizes of a set of isoelectronic ions—ions containing the same number of electrons. Consider the ions O2-, F, Na+, Mg2+, and Al3+. Each of these ions has the neon electron configuration. How do the sizes of these ions vary In general, there are two important facts to consider in predicting the relative sizes of ions the number of electrons and the number of protons. Since these ions are isoelectronic, the number of electrons is 10 in each case. Electron repulsions should therefore be about the same in all cases. However, the number of protons increases from... [Pg.596]

In favorable cases, intensities of cross-peaks between the resonances of two spins i and m that are not directly coupled may yield qualitative information about couplings that are involved in the transfer pathway. Clore et al. (1991) showed that in homonuclear Hartmann-Hahn spectra of proteins, the relative size of the two cross-peaks between the amide and the two H protons yields semiquantitative information about the relative size of the two involved V(H , H ) coupling constants in each amino acid residue. In order to reduce overlap, a three-dimensional N-separated H- H Hartmann-Hahn experiment was employed. With a relatively short mixing time of 30 ms, the relative size of V(H ,H ) coupling constants could be determined with sufficient accuracy to allow stereospecific assignment of the j8-methylene protons. Constantine et al. (1994) used cross-peak and diagonal-peak intensity ratios derived from three-dimensional C-edited TOCSY-HMQC spectra to obtain qualitative or semiquantitative estimates of vicinal H- H coupling constants. [Pg.233]

Integration the relative size of peak area indicates how many protons have the 5 value shown. [Pg.193]

Fig. 12.1. Relative sizes of mitochondrial and chloroplast chromosomes and location of protein structural genes. The figure was constructed from published data [5,15,17,22,26-28]. The structural genes are marked by wide sections. Black areas code for proteins. White areas are introns. 0x1, OxII and OxIII are subunits I, II and III of cytochrome c oxidase. Cyt b, cytochrome b. Fo and Fo, are subunits 6 and 9 of the proton ATPase complex. In the chloroplast chromosome the arrows indicate the transcription direction and the size of the transcripts. CF,a, CFj/8, CFjc and CFoIII are subunits a, /S, t and III of the chloroplast proton ATPase complex [30]. PSII5], PSII44, and PSII34 are subunits of photosystem II reaction center with the corresponding molecular weights of 51000, 44000 and 34000. PSI70 is subunit I of photosystem I reaction center. Cyt /is cytochrome/ cyt is cytochrome b and b -flV is subunit IV of cytochrome b(,-f complex. Fig. 12.1. Relative sizes of mitochondrial and chloroplast chromosomes and location of protein structural genes. The figure was constructed from published data [5,15,17,22,26-28]. The structural genes are marked by wide sections. Black areas code for proteins. White areas are introns. 0x1, OxII and OxIII are subunits I, II and III of cytochrome c oxidase. Cyt b, cytochrome b. Fo and Fo, are subunits 6 and 9 of the proton ATPase complex. In the chloroplast chromosome the arrows indicate the transcription direction and the size of the transcripts. CF,a, CFj/8, CFjc and CFoIII are subunits a, /S, t and III of the chloroplast proton ATPase complex [30]. PSII5], PSII44, and PSII34 are subunits of photosystem II reaction center with the corresponding molecular weights of 51000, 44000 and 34000. PSI70 is subunit I of photosystem I reaction center. Cyt /is cytochrome/ cyt is cytochrome b and b -flV is subunit IV of cytochrome b(,-f complex.
Describe the nuclear model of the atom, including the general location of the protons, neutrons, and electrons, the relative size of the nucleus compared to the size of the atom, and the modern description of the electron. [Pg.60]

A typical atomic radius is about 100 pm, whereas the radius of an atomic nucleus is only about 5 X 10 pm. You can appreciate the relative sizes of an atom and its nucleus by imagining that if an atom were the size of the Houston Astrodome, the volume of its nucleus would be comparable to that of a small marble. While the protons are confined to the nucleus of the atom, the electrons are conceived of as being spread out about the nucleus at some distance from it. [Pg.43]

Scientists must use extremely small and extremely large numbers to describe the objects in Figure 1. The mass of the proton at the center of a hydrogen atom is 0.000000000000000000000000001673 kg. HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, is about 0.00000011 m. The temperature at the center of the Sun reaches 15,000,000 K. Such small and large numbers are difficult to read and hard to work with in calculations. Scientists have adopted a method of writing exponential numbers called scientific notation. It is easier than writing numerous zeros when numbers are very large or very small. It is also easier to compare the relative size of numbers when they are written in scientific notation. [Pg.946]

As mentioned above in this section, PTh is oxidized with two oxidation peaks at around 0.28 and 0.58 V vs. Ag/Ag" in acetonitrile [1641. When oxidized to the second oxidation peak, however, the oxidation product is not stable and loses its electroactivity with protons released during the reverse scan [175]. When the potential is scanned to the first oxidation peak, the electrochemical conversion is chemically reversible with its oxidation product stable. This process is accompanied by the ion transport to maintain the electroneutrality as for oxidation of other conducting polymers. This process w.is found to be significantly dependent on the electrolyte for its shape as well as kinetics [21c]. Cations were also found to affect the redox processes of PTh [175]. These results indicate that both anions and cations can affect the redox chemistry of PThs as for PPy, depending on relative sizes/diffusion coefficients of anions or cations [176,177]. [Pg.446]


See other pages where Protons relative size is mentioned: [Pg.337]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.1061]    [Pg.6213]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.889]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.1061]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.6212]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.581]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.606]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.37]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.25 ]




SEARCH



Relative protonicity

© 2024 chempedia.info