Propane, rearrangement

Allenes are generally prepared by elimination of halogens, hydrogen halides, or water from adjacent carbon atoms, the dehalogenation of gem-dihalocyclo-propanes, rearrangement of acetylenes, and the 1,4-addition to vinylacetylenes. 

The reaction of cyclohexene with the diazopyruvate 25 gives unexpectedly ethyl 3-cyclohexenyl malonate (26), involving Wolff rearrangement. No cyclo-propanation takes place[28]. 1,3-Dipolar cycloaddition takes place by the reaction of acrylonitrile with diazoacetate to afford the oxazole derivative 27[29]. Bis(trimethylstannyl)diazomethane (28) undergoes Pd(0)-catalyzed rearrangement to give the A -stannylcarbodiimide 29 under mild conditions[30]. 

Reaction of 1-ethoxycyclohexene (34) with dichlorocarbene gives 1-ethoxy-7,7-dichloronorcarane (35) in 87 % yield. Rearrangement of dichlorocyclo-propane (35) in hot quinoline results in loss of both chlorine atoms to give l-ethoxycyclohepta-l,3,5-triene (37) in 37% yield. Hydrolysis of enol ether (37) with a very small quantity of hydrochloric acid in methanol produces cyclohepta-3,5-dienone (38) in 91 % yield. ... 

Apart from the carbene-1,2-addition route starting from 1,3-dienes, vinylcyclo-propanes may be obtained from 1,4-dienes through a di-n-methane rearrangement. 

Grobe15 has described the pyrolysis of 1 -methyl-1 -vinyl- and 1,1 -diviny 1-1-silacyclobutanes 166 which led to the formation of methylvinylsilene and divinylsilene, respectively. Under the experimental conditions used, it was suggested that the silenes rearrange to exo-methylene- 1-silacyclo-propanes 167 which extrude methylsilylene or vinylsilylene, respectively. In support of this proposal, when the reactions were carried out in the presence of 2,3-dimethylbutadiene, the anticipated silylenes were trapped as their respective l-silacyclopent-3-enes 168. 

Thus reaction of the 1-propyl cation (13) with water (reaction type a) will yield propan-l-ol (14), elimination of a proton from (13) will yield propene (15, reaction type b), while rearrangement of (13, reaction type d)—in this case migration of He—will yield the 2-propyl cation... 

Type (b) reaction on this rearranged cation (16) will yield more propene (15), while type (a) reaction with water will yield propan-2-ol... 

A different result was obtained in the cycloaddition to methylenecyclo-propanes 216-218 tearing alkoxycarbonyl substituents on the cyclopropyl ring. In this instance, 1,2,3-triazoles 220 isomeric with the triazolines 219 were formed in the reaction [57]. The formation of triazoles 220 is rationalised by the intermediate formation of triazolines 219, which are unstable under the reaction conditions and undergo a rearrangement to the aromatic triazoles via a hydrogen transfer that probably occurs with the assistance of the proximal ester carbonyl (Scheme 35). The formation of triazoles 220 also confirms the regio-chemistry of the cycloaddition for the methylene unsubstituted methylene-cyclopropanes, still leaving some doubt for the substituted ones 156 and 157. 

Thus a Cope rearrangement proceeding through a boat-like transition state is the rearrangement of cis 1, 2 divinyl cyclo-propane. 

Dioxenes react, as expected, to produce thermally unstable dihalocyclo-propanes in high yield [51, 89]. Upon heating, the bicyclic system rearranges to yield the dichloromethyl-1,4-dioxene, whereas the tricyclic system, derived from the benzo-l,4-dioxene undergoes ring expansion to produce the benzo-1,5-dioxepin (Scheme 7.11). 

The observation that essentially the same rate constants are measured in methane and propane at 40 and 100 °C demonstrates that the starting oxonium ion 35 is in thermal equilibrium with the bulk gas and that its unimolecular rearrangement depends exclusively on the reaction temperature. 

Since the addition of methylene to an olefin should be exothermic, with the evolution of about 90 kcal/mole, isomerisations of the initially formed cyclo-propanes are very likely, since they only need about 64 kcal/mole. RRKM-studies demonstrate that this isomerisation should be faster than the rearrangement of cyclopropanes 32, 33 to the pentenes 34, 35 Numerous studies of the photochemical generation in the gas phase provided conclusive evidence in favour of these findings uo.iii.iis). 

Pillai and Pines (84) found that neopentyl alcohol, mixed with 10% by weight of piperidine and passed over alumina prepared from aluminum isopropoxide, yielded 2-methyl-l-butene and 2-methyl-2-butene, in a maximum ratio of 3, and small amounts of 1,1-dimethylcyclo-propane. However, lert-pentyl alcohol yielded these two olefins in a maximum ratio of only 1.4, and none of the cyclopropane was produced (Table VI). Because of these facts a carbonium ion mechanism which is applicable to ferf-pentyl alcohol is not adequate to explain the rearrangement taking place during the dehydration of neopentyl alcohol,... 

Studies of di-ir-methane photochemical rearrangements have been one of the main areas of research in organic photochemistry for many years (for reviews, see Refs. 1-4). The first example of a reaction of this type was reported by Zimmerman in 1967 in the sensitized irradiation of barrelene 1 that yields semibullvalene 2 [5] (Scheme 1). The reaction has been extended to a large number of acyclic and cyclic 1,4-dienes that yield the corresponding vinylcyclo-propanes on irradiation, in the di-ir-methane (DPM) version of the rearrangement. This reaction also takes place when a vinyl unit is replaced by an aryl group. A few representative examples of DPM rearrangements are shown in Scheme 1 [6-9]. 

---