Projected area dimension

For an image of a fractal represented with pixels, these distances are distributed into bins of width Ar representing different distance ranges so that the total number of times that a distance between r — Ar/2 and r + Ar/1 occurs in the image is recorded for different r. The projected area dimension may then be obtained from a plot of log(Ar) versus log(r), according to... 

One of the easiest ways to measure fractal dimension with this technique is to capture images of slices through the structure and measure the fractal scaling of the image as discussed above. The dimension measured in this way is not the projected area dimension Dp, discussed earlier, because the image is a slice not a projection. It turns out that the dimension measured in this way is numerically equal to the mass fractal dimension minus one, by virtue of the codimension rule [58]. The measurement of fractal dimensions by this technique is not subject to the restriction of geometric transparency, as is the case with the analysis of projected images, and so fractal dimensions well over two can be measured. 

Single image microscopy Projected area dimension analysis Resolution dependent Moderate to high Any 2 Finite size correction should be applied. Contrast should be high enough to allow image segmentation... 

Pxampk 2. A smooth spherical body of projected area Al moves through a fluid of density p and viscosity p with speed O. The total drag 8 encountered by the sphere is to be determined. Clearly, the total drag 8 is a function of O, Al, p, and p. As before, mass length /, and time t are chosen as the reference dimensions. From Table 1 the dimensional matrix is (eq. 23) ... 

In practice the clamping pressure will also depend on the geometry of the cavity. In particular the flow ratio (flow length/channel lateral dimension) is important. Fig. 4.42 illustrates typical variations in the Mean Effective Pressure in the cavity for different thicknesses and flow ratios. The data used here is typical for easy flow materials such as polyethylene, polypropylene and polystyrene. To calculate the clamp force, simply multiply the appropriate Mean Effective Pressure by the projected area of the moulding. In practice it is... 

To obtain a value for the dimensions of an irregular particle, several measurement approaches can be used Martin s diameter (defined as the length of a line that bisects the particle image), Feret s diameter (or end-to-end measurement, defined as the distance between two tangents on opposite sides of the particle parallel to some fixed direction), and the projected area diameter (defined as the diameter of a circle having the same area as that of the particle observed perpendicular to the surface on which the particle rests). With any technique, a sufficiently large number of particles is required in order to obtain a statistically valid conclusion. This is best accomplished by using a... 

Microscopic examination permits measurement of the projected area of the particle and also enables an assessment to be made of its two-dimensional shape. In general, the third dimension cannot be determined except when using special stereomicroscopes. The apparent size of particle is compared with that of circles engraved on a graticule in the eyepiece as shown in Figure 1.3. Automatic methods of scanning have been developed. By using the electron microscope 7, the lower limit of size can be reduced to about 0.001 pan. 

If dp is the mean projected diameter, the mean projected area is nd2/4 and the volume is k d2, where k is a constant whose value depends on the shape of the particle. For a spherical particle, k is equal to tt/6. For rounded isometric particles, that is particles in which the dimension in three mutually perpendicular directions is approximately the same, k is about 0.5, and for angular particles k is about 0.4. For most minerals k lies between 0.2 and 0.5. 

A Projected area of particle in plane perpendicular to direction of motion Units in SI System m2 Dimensions in M, L, T L2... 

Bone mineral density (BMD) measured using dual x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is the current standard method by which to assess BMD in children and adolescents (Loud and Gordon, 2006). It has some limitations in that it only measures bone in two dimensions (g/cm ) and by utilizing the projected area for areal measurements does not account for bone volume or distance of the subject from the beam [i.e., surrounding tissue mass and (re)positioning]. Moreover, the continuous changes in... 

If the projected areas of the particles are compared with the areas of series of circles the projected area diameters generated describe the particles in two dimensions for the orientation in which they are measured. 

Consider a particle circumscribed by a rectangular parallelepiped of dimensions Z by 5 by T, then the projected area of the particle is given by ... 

There are two especially important properties of particles, surface and volume, and these are proportional to the square and cube respectively of some characteristic dimension. The constants of proportionality depend upon the dimensions chosen to characterize the particles the projected area diameter is used in the following discussion. The surface area and volume of a particle are given by the following equations ... 

Projected area diameter (d ) takes into account both dimensions of the particle in the measurement plane, being the diameter of a circle having the same projected area as the particle. It is necessary to differentiate between this diameter and the projected area diameter for a particle in random orientation (d ) since, in this case, the third and smallest dimension of the particle is also included. 

The easiest diameter to measure is the Feret diameter but this is significantly larger than the other two diameters for most powders. It is probably best to reserve this diameter for comparison purposes and for rounded particles. Of the other two diameters, the projected area diameter is preferred since two dimensions are included in one measurement and the projected area is easier to estimate using globe and circle graticules than the length of the chord that bisects the image. 

He concluded that there was no definite advantage to be gained by laboriously measuring profiles. As one might expect, the projected area diameters gave the best estimate of the true cross-sectional areas of the particles. This does not rule out the use of the other diameters if they are conveniently measured, since the cross sectional-area diameter of a particle is not necessarily its optimum dimension. 

Box counting method is commonly used to obtain mass fractal dimension from an aggregate s projected area. 

Microscopy is a widely used particle sizing technique in which individual particles are observed and measured. Optical microscopy is used for examination of particles from about 150—0.8 microns. For smaller particles an electron microscope is needed. A single particle has an infinite number of linear dimensions and it is only when they are averaged that a meaningful value is yielded. When a linear dimension is measured parallel to some fixed direction, the size distribution of these measurements reflects the size distribution of the projected areas of the particles [3]. ... 

No. of primnry particles X - Projected area Penetration. j M (calculated ncc. coeflicient v Numerical derivation) Envelop diameter (calculated acc. Numerical derivation) 2w, nm] Radins of gyration Rg nm] Fractnl dimension D, Fractal prefactor... 

The experiments were carried out in a wind tunnel at University of Surrey, UK. A model canopy was installed on the ground plane of a wind tunnel which has a working section with dimensions of 1.37 m in width and of 1.68 m in height. The canopy was formed from an extended array of obstacles. Earlier, cylindrical wooden pegs [411] and metal rods [213] were used as individual obstacles. In this experiment, it was aimed to vary the vertical distribution of the projected area of obstructions. 

The characteristics of disperse systems (see Section 1.1.2) are determined by geometrical parameters, i.e. linear dimensions, projection areas, surfaces, volumes, and, sometimes, angular dimensions. In addition, other physical characteristics, which do not directly represent particle size, may be used for the determination of these parameters. In such cases, a mathematical conversion into the desired geometrical dimension takes place. The term particle size analysis defines the experimental determination of particle characteristics and the statistical treatment of results. 

Figure 21. Schematic representation of different dispersion characteristics derived from the projection area. The size thus determined does not reflect the vertical dimensions (thickness) of the particle...

The permeability methods measure only that portion of the surface which is in contact with the flowing fluid. Pores within the particles do not contribute to the pressure drop (Figure 24a). The same limitations apply to the photometric methods where pores or concave parts of the particle shape are not detected because, in reality, the projection area of the particles is determined. In comparison, during gas adsorption, the ions or molecules penetrate deep into the pores and cover the entire particle surface irrespective of shape (Figure 24b). Therefore, depending on the dimensions of the pores and ions or molecules, much higher surface areas are measured with the adsorption methods than with the two other procedures. 

---