Process systems engineers thinking

Process systems engineers have at their disposal a series of tools and techniques that have evolved, or were designed, to precisely maximize the use of materials and energy, reduce hazards, and incorporate life cycle thinking and hoHstic design. A testament of this is... 

Our failure risk analysis and opportunity method and iterative software tool, as part of our New Product Process Innovation (NPPI) Tool Library, promotes systematic collaboration and team-oriented engineering thinking when a new pharmaceutical manufacturing system process and/or product are developed. (We call it opportunity method too, since most risks, if not all, offer new opportunities for innovation.) It is based on our generic process failure risk analysis method that could be apphed to literally any process that involves risk—and innovation is a very risky process. 

We must broaden the thought process and create holistic-thinking systems engineers, encouraging out of the box thinking and ensuring they have a wide enough aperture to see all aspects and implications of the product. 

All associations are intended to initiate or expand chains of thought, sequences of ideas, or lines of evolution of ideas (using the terminology of the theory of evolution of engineering systems [Zlotin and Zusman 2006]). They are like catalysts in the process of chain thinking. 

At this point it must be determined what functions each component in the system wfll be requhed to fulfill and how each wiU function together with other components in the system. The management and operation staff usually know what they would like the system to do and how they can best accompHsh it. They have probably selected equipment that they think will do the job. With a familiarity of the capabilities of different equipment, the systems engineer should be able to contribute to this function-definition stage of the process. Questions that need to be answered include... 

Taking into account all the above-said, the authors think it of interest to suggest one more solution for chemical production unification. It consists not in designing separate chemical engineering processes, differing in both chemical and engineering bases, but in the creation of chemical systems in which chemical reactions with abundant general properties can be realized. 

In other words, women really rock the boat. That s tough. Just now, a woman has been in the actual primary salary data in the School of Engineering for the first time in the history of the school. To me this is a major breakthrough. It didn t rock the boat MIT is still standing. I think that it can be done within the same system if it is a truly integrated process like that. 

---