Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Prime ideal

Let X be a smooth projective variety over the complex numbers C. Then X is already defined over a finitely generated extension ring R of Z, i.e. there is a variety Xr defined over R such that Xr xr C = X. For every prime ideal p of R let Xp = XR xr R/p. There is a nonempty open subset U C pec(R) such that Xp is smooth for all p U, and the /-adic Betti-numbers of Xp coincide with those of X for all primes / different from the characteristic of A/p (cf. [Kirwan (1) 15.], [Bialynicki-Birula, Sommese (1) 2.]. If m C R is a maximal ideal lying in U for which R/m is a finite field Fq of characteristic p /, we call Xm a good reduction of X modulo q. [Pg.5]

If the base ring k is not a field, then even maximal ideals turn out to be not quite all we want. The kernel of a homomorphism Z[X] - Z, for instance, is not maximal. The next natural generalization is to prime ideals, and these do indeed give a satisfactory theory. [Pg.51]

The spectrum Spec A of a ring A is the collection of its prime ideals. To see what topology it should have, consider fc. A closed set there is the set where a certain ideal I of functions vanishes the corresponding maximal ideals... [Pg.51]

Proof. Since nQA is reduced, it injects into it0(A/iy,.we must show the dimensions are the same. As / fc still consists of nilpotents, we may assume k = k. Then dim(7t0 A) is the number of connected components of Spec A. But since I is in every prime ideal, Spec A is homeomorphic to Spec(/ //). [Pg.62]

Lemma. Let A be an integral domain finitely generated over afield k. Let P be a nonzero prime ideal. The fraction field of A/P has lower transcendence degree than the fraction field of A. [Pg.106]

Domains of course have no nontrivial nilpotents, so a nilpotent element/ in R is in all prime ideals. Conversely, if/ is not nilpotent, take a maximal ideal J in Af its inverse image in R is prime and does.not containf Thus the set N of nilpotent elements in R is an ideal equal to the intersection of all prime ideals. One calls N the nilradical, and says R is reduced if N = 0. [Pg.163]

Going-up theorem of Cohen-Seidenberg. Let R be a ring (commutative as always) and S C R a subring such that R is integrally dependent on S. For all prime ideals P C S, there exist prime ideals P C R such that P fl S = P. [Pg.3]

Recall that by the noetherian decomposition theorem, if A C k [Xi,..., Xn is an ideal such that A = y/A, then A can be written in exactly one way as an intersection of a finite set of prime ideals, none of which contains any other. And a prime ideal is not the intersection of any two strictly bigger ideals. Therefore ... [Pg.7]

Proposition 2. In the bijection of the Corollary to Theorem 1, the irreducible algebraic sets correspond exactly to the prime ideals of k [X, ..., Xn]. Moreover, every closed algebraic set E can be written in exactly one way as ... [Pg.7]

Definition of Projective Varieties. Let P C k[Xo,..., Xn] be a homogeneous prime ideal, X = V(P) C Pn(k). We want to make X (with the Zariski topology) into a prevariety. We do it by defining a function field, getting local rings, and intersecting them, just as for affine varieties. [Pg.28]

Algebraic Version (Krull s Principal Ideal Theorem). Let R be a finitely generated integral domain over k, f R, P an isolated prime ideal of (/) (i.e., minimal among the prime ideals containing it). Then if f 0, tr.d-kR/P = tr.d. kR — 1-... [Pg.41]

In order to have an unambiguous notation, we shall write [P] for the element of Spec (R) given by the prime ideal P. This allows us to distinguish between the times when we think of P as an ideal in P, and the times when we think of [P] as a point in Spec (R). [Pg.66]

Spec (R) need not satisfy axiom Tl. In fact, the closure of [P] is exactly V(P), i.e., P1 P D P. Therefore [P] is a closed point if and only if P is a maximal ideal. At the other extreme, when R is an integral domain, (O) is a prime ideal and [(O)] is called the generic point of Spec (R) since its closure is the whole of Spec R. More generally, we define ... [Pg.67]

Proposition 1. Ifx E Spec (R), then the closure of x is irreducible andx is a generic point of this set. Conversely, every irreducible closed subset Z C Spec (R) equals V(P) for some prime ideal P C R, and [P] is its unique generic point. [Pg.67]

Proof. Spec (R) is the union of the Spec (R) fa s if and only if every point [P] does not contain some /<. This means that no prime ideal contains (..., fa,...), and this happens if and only if... [Pg.68]

Note that once we have Lemmas 1 and 2, the rest is purely sheaf-theoretic. One further point which is useful since our topological space has non-closed points, we have some maps between the stalks ox of ox. Suppose P C P2 are 2 prime ideals. Let Xi = [Pf]. Then x2 i, so every neighbourhood U of x2 contains xi this gives us a map ... [Pg.71]

Example B. Spec (fc[X]) the affine line over k. This is denoted A. k[X] has 2 types of prime ideals (o) and (f(X)), / an an irreducible polynomial. Therefore Spec (A [X]) has one closed point for each monic irreducible polynomial, and one generic point [(o)] whose closure is all of Spec (fc[X]). Assume k is algebraically closed. Then the closed points are all of the form [(X — o)] we call this the point X = a , and we find that A is just the ordinary X-line together with a generic point. The most general proper closed set is just a finite union of closed points. [Pg.72]

Example D. Almost identical comments apply to Spec (R) for any Dedekind domain R. In fact, all prime ideals are maximal or (0) hence again we have a line of closed points plus a generic point. (However, if R is not a P.I.D., we cannot conclude as before that all non-empty open sets are distinguished we know only that they are gotten by throwing out a finite set of closed points.)... [Pg.73]

Example E. = Spec (k[X,Y]), k algebraically closed. We get the maximal ideals (X — a, Y — b), the principal prime ideals (f(X, Y)), for / irreducible, and (0). By dimension theory there axe no other prime ideals. The set of maximal ideals gives us a set of closed points isomorphic to the usual X, F-plane. Then we must add one big generic point and for every irreducible curve, a point generic in that curve but not sticking out of it ... [Pg.73]

Example H. Spec (Z[X]). This is a so-called arithmetic surface and is the first example which has a real mixing of arithmetic and geometric properties. The prime ideals in Z[X] are ... [Pg.74]


See other pages where Prime ideal is mentioned: [Pg.29]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.76]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.153 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.153 ]




SEARCH



Prime

© 2024 chempedia.info