Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Potential barrier, effect function

This is connnonly known as the transition state theory approximation to the rate constant. Note that all one needs to do to evaluate (A3.11.187) is to detennine the partition function of the reagents and transition state, which is a problem in statistical mechanics rather than dynamics. This makes transition state theory a very usefiil approach for many applications. However, what is left out are two potentially important effects, tiiimelling and barrier recrossing, bodi of which lead to CRTs that differ from the sum of step frmctions assumed in (A3.11.1831. [Pg.993]

Similar to the case without consideration of the GP effect, the nuclear probability densities of Ai and A2 symmetries have threefold symmetry, while each component of E symmetry has twofold symmetry with respect to the line defined by (3 = 0. However, the nuclear probability density for the lowest E state has a higher symmetry, being cylindrical with an empty core. This is easyly understand since there is no potential barrier for pseudorotation in the upper sheet. Thus, the nuclear wave function can move freely all the way around the conical intersection. Note that the nuclear probability density vanishes at the conical intersection in the single-surface calculations as first noted by Mead [76] and generally proved by Varandas and Xu [77]. The nuclear probability density of the lowest state of Aj (A2) locates at regions where the lower sheet of the potential energy surface has A2 (Ai) symmetry in 5s. Note also that the Ai levels are raised up, and the A2 levels lowered down, while the order of the E levels has been altered by consideration of the GP effect. Such behavior is similar to that encountered for the trough states [11]. [Pg.598]

The metallic electrode materials are characterized by their Fermi levels. The position of the Fermi level relative to the eneigetic levels of the organic layer determines the potential barrier for charge carrier injection. The workfunction of most metal electrodes relative to vacuum are tabulated [103]. However, this nominal value will usually strongly differ from the effective workfunction in the device due to interactions of the metallic- with the organic material, which can be of physical or chemical nature [104-106]. Therefore, to calculate the potential barrier height at the interface, the effective work function of the metal and the effective ionization potential and electron affinity of the organic material at the interface have to be measured [55, 107],... [Pg.160]

Tethering may be a reversible or an irreversible process. Irreversible grafting is typically accomplished by chemical bonding. The number of grafted chains is controlled by the number of grafting sites and their functionality, and then ultimately by the extent of the chemical reaction. The reaction kinetics may reflect the potential barrier confronting reactive chains which try to penetrate the tethered layer. Reversible grafting is accomplished via the self-assembly of polymeric surfactants and end-functionalized polymers [59]. In this case, the surface density and all other characteristic dimensions of the structure are controlled by thermodynamic equilibrium, albeit with possible kinetic effects. In this instance, the equilibrium condition involves the penalties due to the deformation of tethered chains. [Pg.46]

Figure 3.5 Graphical representation of the quantum mechanical tunnelling effect between tip and sample. The probability P of a particle with kinetic energy E tunnelling through a potential barrier cf> is shown as a function of sample-tip separation z. Figure 3.5 Graphical representation of the quantum mechanical tunnelling effect between tip and sample. The probability P of a particle with kinetic energy E tunnelling through a potential barrier cf> is shown as a function of sample-tip separation z.
Equation (1) suggests that tunnel junctions should be ohmic. This is true only for very small bias. A much better description of the tunneling current results when the effects of barrier shape, changes in barrier with applied potential, and effective mass of the electron are all included. An example of such an improved relationship is given by (2), where / is the current density, a is a unitless parameter used to account empirically for non-rectangular barrier shape and deviations in the effective electron mass, and barrier height given by B = (L + work function of the left-hand metal ... [Pg.194]

This fact allows the effective relaxation of steric repulsion. The potential barrier for the motion around the C—C single bonds is smaller than that corresponding to the motion around the central C=C bond. Using the potential functions computed for these motions, and assuming a Boltzmann distribution, average torsional angles of 7.7 and 7.1, at 300 K, are obtained for rotations around Cl—C3 and C1=C2, respectively. This torsional motion seems to be due to the nonplanar structure observed experimentally. [Pg.10]

Why do some drugs and chemicals in our diets affect our brains and how we feel while others have no effect on us Many drugs that might potentially influence brain function are never able to enter the brain because of the presence of a series of barriers the most important of these is the blood—brain barrier. This barrier allows the easy entry of drugs that are lipid... [Pg.15]

Thus, again, as in the pseudo-JT effect considered in Section 3 and, also, in the E <8> e case [7], the tunneling rate E is proportional to the probability flux through the bottleneck point of the potential barrier. Similar to equation (21), the right-side (9 > 0) ground-state WKB wave function under the barrier is... [Pg.79]

Representative potential energies as functions of the reaction coordinate are shown. Path (a) is followed in the gas phase and path (b) is followed in a polar solvent the change in the potential energy in a polar solvent shows that both reactants and products are more stabilized than the transition state, because the electrons are less localized in the transition state than in the ionic state. The solvent is seen to have a strong effect on the reaction barrier, so the rate constant in solution may be many... [Pg.224]

A chemical molecule, by contrast consists of many particles. In the most general case N independent constituent electrons and nuclei generate a molecular Hamiltonian as the sum over N kinetic energy operators. The common wave function encodes all information pertaining to the system. In order to constitute a molecule in any but a formal sense it is necessary for the set of particles to stay confined to a common region of space-time. The effect is the same as on the single confined particle. Their behaviour becomes more structured and interactions between individual particles occur. Each interaction generates a Coulombic term in the molecular Hamiltonian. The effect of these terms are the same as of potential barriers and wells that modify the boundary conditions. The wave function stays the same, only some specific solutions become disallowed by the boundary conditions imposed by the environment. [Pg.217]

So far only one specific characteristic of computed surface potentials seems to have an important effect on experimental results. For thermionic emission of surfaces subject to an electric field, the Richardson equation must be modified in two ways. First the potential barrier is lowered by the electric field to give a new work function. In addition the reflection coefficient is altered. The relative current )/ 0 as a function of applied field E becomes... [Pg.51]

Table I shows that the band gap, the energy difference between HOMO (highest occupied molecular orbitals) and LUMO (lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals) levels, decreases monotonically with the increase in network dimension. This decrease is caused by the delocalization of skeleton a electrons, which form both band edges. As is well known, eigenvalues of delocalized wave functions confined to a potential well are determined by the well size and potential-barrier heights. When delocalized wave functions are confined to a smaller area, the HOMO level moves downward and the LUMO level moves upwards, which results in the increase in band gap energy. This quantum size effect is given by... Table I shows that the band gap, the energy difference between HOMO (highest occupied molecular orbitals) and LUMO (lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals) levels, decreases monotonically with the increase in network dimension. This decrease is caused by the delocalization of skeleton a electrons, which form both band edges. As is well known, eigenvalues of delocalized wave functions confined to a potential well are determined by the well size and potential-barrier heights. When delocalized wave functions are confined to a smaller area, the HOMO level moves downward and the LUMO level moves upwards, which results in the increase in band gap energy. This quantum size effect is given by...
Figure 2 Field emitted electrons escape into vacuum from a solid of work function by tunnelling through an approximately triangular potential barrier 1.5 nm thick, produced by the combined effect of an applied field F and image potential... Figure 2 Field emitted electrons escape into vacuum from a solid of work function by tunnelling through an approximately triangular potential barrier 1.5 nm thick, produced by the combined effect of an applied field F and image potential...

See other pages where Potential barrier, effect function is mentioned: [Pg.234]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.706]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.542]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.430]    [Pg.742]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.866]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.501]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.400]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.23]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.142 , Pg.143 ]




SEARCH



Barrier effect

Barriers, potential

Effective barrier

Effective functionality

Effective potential functions

Effects function

Functional barrier

Potential barrier, effect

Potential function

Potentials potential functions

© 2024 chempedia.info