Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Post-distribution rate constant difference

When an administered drug exhibits the characteristics of a two-compartment model, the difference between the distribution rate constant (a) and the slow (post-) distribution rate constant (/ ) plays a critical role. The greater the difference between these, the more conspicuous is the existence of a two-compartment model and, therefore, the greater is the need to apply all the equations for a two-compartment model. Failure to do so will, undoubtedly, result in inaccurate clinical predictions. If, however, the difference between the distribution and the slow post-distribution rate constant is small and will not cause any significant difference in the clinical predictions, regardless of the model chosen to describe the pharmacokinetics of a drug, then it may be prudent to follow the principle of... [Pg.277]

Figure 13.12 A semilogarithmic plot of the difference between pbsma concentrations measured and those obtained by extrapolation [(Cp)diff] for a drug that obeys a two Figure 13.12 A semilogarithmic plot of the difference between pbsma concentrations measured and those obtained by extrapolation [(Cp)diff] for a drug that obeys a two<ompartment model following intravenous bolus administration, p, slow disposition, or post-distribution, rate constant A, empirical constant Vc, apparent volume of distribution for the central compartment /C21, transfer rate constant Xq, administered dose a, distribution rate constant.
Both the intrinsic rate constant and the effective diffusivity (KD) can be extracted from measurements of the reaction rate with different size fractions of the zeohte crystals. This approach has been demonstrated by Haag et al. [116] for cracking of n-hexane on HZSM5 and by Post et al. [117] for isomerization of 2,2-dimethylbutane over HZSM-5. It is worth commenting that in Haag s analysis the equilibrium constant (or distribution coefficient K) was omitted, leading to erroneously large apparent diffusivity values. [Pg.38]

In Figure 10.30 the survival rate of the total sedimentary mass for the different Phanerozoic systems is plotted and compared with survival rates for the total carbonate and dolomite mass distribution. The difference between the two latter survival rates for each system is the mass of limestone surviving per unit of time. Equation 10.1 is the log linear relationship for the total sedimentary mass, and implies a 130 million year half-life for the post-Devonian mass, and for a constant sediment mass with a constant probability of destruction, a mean sedimentation rate since post-Devonian time of about 100 x 1014 g y 1. The modem global erosional flux is 200 x 1014 g y-1, of which about 15% is particulate and dissolved carbonate. Although the data are less reliable for the survival rate of Phanerozoic carbonate sediments than for the total sedimentary mass, a best log linear fit to the post-Permian preserved mass of carbonate rocks is... [Pg.551]


See other pages where Post-distribution rate constant difference is mentioned: [Pg.228]    [Pg.2502]    [Pg.2502]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.277 ]




SEARCH



Distribution constant

Distribution rate constant difference

Distribution rate constants

Post-distribution rate constant

Rate constants differences

© 2024 chempedia.info