Polarization dependent density functional structures

This approximation is better known as the time-dependent Hartree—Fock approximation (TDHF) (McLachlan and Ball, 1964) (see Section 11.1) or random phase approximation (RPA) (Rowe, 1968) and can also be derived as the linear response of an SCF wavefunction, as described in Section 11.2. Furthermore, the structure of the equations is the same as in time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT), although they differ in the expressions for the elements of the Hessian matrix E22. The polarization propagator in the RPA is then given as... 

While the concentration dependence of the experimental fields are reproduced rather well by the theoretical fields (a phase transition to the BCC structure occurs around 65% Fe), the later ones are obviously too small. This finding has been ascribed in the past to a shortcoming of plain spin density functional theory in dealing with the core polarization mechanism (Ebert et al. 1988a). Recent work done on the basis of the optimized potential method (OPM) gave results for the pure elements Fe, Co and Ni in very good agreement with experiment (Akai and Kotani 1999). 

In order to investigate both the water structure in the vicinity of a non-polar solute (hydrophobie hydration) and the eorrelation between two solute molecules in water (pair hydrophobieity), one caleulates the change in local density of water molecules at r due to the introduetion of a solute molecule at the origin. According to the linear response theory, the response (that is, the change) of the densities is dependent on the structure of water in the absenee of the disturbance. As a result, the equations for solute-pair eorrelations become dependent on the water-water correlation functions for pure water. 

The most commonly used model for understanding the relationship between the hyperpolarizability P and molecular structure is the two-state model (Oudar and Chemla, 1977). This model provides only a rough description but it allows a qualitative understanding of the nonlinear optical properties of molecules. For push-pull compounds with electron donors and acceptors, the P value depends mainly on the intramolecular polarization, the oscillator strength, and the excited state of the material (Allis and Spencer, 2001). There are three different possibilities for a refinement of the two-state model semi-empirical, ab initio and density functional theory methods (Li et al., 1992 Kanis et al., 1994 Kurtz and Dudis, 1998). 

The quality of the KS orbitals depends to a large part on the ability of a chosen density functional to correctly represent the groimd state density of a given molecule. In most cases, different density functionals produce qualitatively identical orbitals, which also agree with WFT orbitals. For molecules that might posses a spin-polarized ground state density, different methods of electronic structure calculation not only produce quantitatively different results, but also lead to qualitatively contrastive conclusions. One such case is illustrated in O Fig. 4-7. We leave it to the reader to decide whether or not chemically meaningful information can be extracted from the orbital picture as displayed in O Fig. 4-7. 

The lowest energy structures were found to be the above carbon and above bond geometries (Fig. 6d and e, respectively). This is a function of the anisotropy of the electron density around the iodine and the geometry dependent polarization of the dihalogen. 

The polarization density is a functional of the solute charge density T s(r)= < Fs f s(r) Fs>. The effective Hamiltonian Eq.(16) acquires a non-linear structure via the polarization density term, i.e. the effective Hamiltonian a functional dependence of the wave function ... 

---