Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Photoemission experiment effect

In hindsight, it was Hertz who, unknowingly, reported the first photoemission experiments in 1887, when he noticed that electrical sparks induced the formation of a second spark in a variety of samples [1], Hertz correctly recognized that the effect was due to UV light generated by the first spark, but he did not understand the nature of the induced spark. In fact he could not have done so, because the electron had not yet been discovered. About ten years later Thomson identified the radiation in... [Pg.52]

In general one can say that those parts of the band that correspond to bonds which have been broken in order to create the surface are narrower. A similar effect can be expected for small particles the average coordination number of the atom decreases and the bands are narrower. This effect can be observed in photoemission experiments an example is shown in Fig. 3.18. [Pg.304]

Spurious effects due to incompletely removed oxides layers are very likely to be recorded and misinterpreted in photoemission experiments from the very oxidizable U-metal surface. However, considering only high resolution XPS and UPS data for clean surfaces as well as the measurements using synchrotron radiation , it can be... [Pg.223]

Photoemission experiments with flat surfaces revealed that atoms of lower coordination may have a different population of d-orbitals and a different local density of states (138-140). These effects have been also predicted and analyzed theoretically (94-97, 136, 137), and should be always considered. The only question is whether they manifest themselves in the chemisorption and catalytic behavior. In any case, the impression is that by making metal particles small in size, one can cause the electronic structure of a certain fraction of the metal atoms to vary more than by making a bulk solution alloy. [Pg.161]

Photoemission experiments are sensitive only to states that are close to the surface because of the short escape depth of the electrons. The escape depth varies with energy and is only aobut 10 A at 10-100 eV, increasing to 40-50 A above 1 keV, so that the larger energies tend to be more appropriate for the study of bulk properties. Surface states usually extend no more than 5-7 A into the bulk and so their contribution should be small in the XPS spectra. However, in view of the growth process of a-Si H and the effects of hydrogen near the... [Pg.68]

The above calculation suggests that a singlet formation due to strong correlations with a triplet excited state should be found in appropriate molecules. The effect requires an even total number of valence electrons. In order to detect it one should search e.g. for molecules containing Ce, which are diamagnetic, but which show a f-electron count close to 1, when photoemission experiments are performed. [Pg.288]

Fig. 2.2 Geometrical arrangements being necessary in photoemission experiments using dichroic effects. Left CDAD. Middle MCDAD. Right MLDAD. q denotes the photon propagation direction, Oph the angle of the incoming photon beam, the photoelectron momentum, n the surface normal, and M the magnetization direction... Fig. 2.2 Geometrical arrangements being necessary in photoemission experiments using dichroic effects. Left CDAD. Middle MCDAD. Right MLDAD. q denotes the photon propagation direction, Oph the angle of the incoming photon beam, the photoelectron momentum, n the surface normal, and M the magnetization direction...
Fig. 3A-C. Representations of the differential-charging effect. A Heterogeneous sample consisting of conducting base (black) and a structured insulating surface (grey). The arrows depict schematically current trajectories for different spots of the sample denoted by the indices 1,2, 3 (11,12,13 - emitted currents). Due to different resistance properties, different potentials Ui, U2, U3 arise. B Electrical equivalence diagram for a sample under constant irradiation. C Effect of differential charging on the position of the energy scale of the photoemission experiment... Fig. 3A-C. Representations of the differential-charging effect. A Heterogeneous sample consisting of conducting base (black) and a structured insulating surface (grey). The arrows depict schematically current trajectories for different spots of the sample denoted by the indices 1,2, 3 (11,12,13 - emitted currents). Due to different resistance properties, different potentials Ui, U2, U3 arise. B Electrical equivalence diagram for a sample under constant irradiation. C Effect of differential charging on the position of the energy scale of the photoemission experiment...
Photoemission spectroscopy (PES) is by far the most widely used and powerful spectroscopic technique for interface research. XPS and UPS are complementary techniques that utilize different light sources, e.g., x-ray and ultraviolet, to excite electrons in solids via photoelectric effect and then collect the escaped photoelectrons with an energy analyzer. In general, photoemission experiments for interface formation studies are performed in the following way. The study begins with the photoemission analysis of a clean surface of the material that will eventually form one side of the... [Pg.187]

A similar behaviour is found for the isomer shift at a 3d atom site (fig. 93b). The broken line connects the IS values in Fe metal with those in Th Fe, (Viccaro et al., 1979). In these cases, too, the IS values in the amorphous alloys (full circles) do not behave extraordinarily. It seems therefore that in order to understand the differences in magnetic properties between amorphous and crystalline materials, one has to look for a mechanism other than that of a reduced charge transfer. Further experimental evidence refuting charge transfer effects as the main origin for the moment reduction upon alloying will be discussed in the next section, dealing with photoemission experiments. [Pg.399]

The LDA -I- U has been extensively used in studies of lanthanides, but a comprehensive review will not be given here. Some significant applications and reviews are reported in Antonov et al. (1998), Gotsis and Mazin (2003), Duan et al. (2007), Larson et al. (2007), and Torumba et al. (2006). The method is almost as fast as a conventional band structure method, and when comparisons to experimental photoemission experiments are made, the LDA + U method provides a much improved energy position of localized bands over the LDA/LSD. In addition, often, the precise position of occupied f-states is not essential to describe bonding properties, rather the crucial effect is that the f-states are moved away from the Fermi level. [Pg.20]

Fig. 16. CeRu2Si2 Fermi surface sheets for quasiparticles with f-character. The labels xj/ and a, 8, refer to the branches observed in dHvA experiments (Lonzarich, 1988 Albessard et al., 1993). Left Hole surface centered around the Z-point of the Brillouin zone with effective mass m 100m which dominates the specific heat y-value. For localized f-electrons at elevated temperatures, the hole surface expands extending to the boundaries of the Brillouin zone while the multiply connected electron-like surface shrinks. The expansion of xj/ is confirmed by photoemission experiments. Right Multiply-connected electron-like sheet. Fig. 16. CeRu2Si2 Fermi surface sheets for quasiparticles with f-character. The labels xj/ and a, 8, refer to the branches observed in dHvA experiments (Lonzarich, 1988 Albessard et al., 1993). Left Hole surface centered around the Z-point of the Brillouin zone with effective mass m 100m which dominates the specific heat y-value. For localized f-electrons at elevated temperatures, the hole surface expands extending to the boundaries of the Brillouin zone while the multiply connected electron-like surface shrinks. The expansion of xj/ is confirmed by photoemission experiments. Right Multiply-connected electron-like sheet.

See other pages where Photoemission experiment effect is mentioned: [Pg.80]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.536]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.565]    [Pg.422]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.422]    [Pg.545]    [Pg.620]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.445]    [Pg.802]    [Pg.821]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.1917]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.476 ]




SEARCH



Photoemission

Photoemission experiments

Photoemissive effect

© 2024 chempedia.info