Secondary phase separation

Aluminosilicate ash (Class F) Quart/ and unburm carbon Melt, mullite. Ie4),. Fed), Glass-in-glass phase separation secondary mullite... 

Solution Properties. Typically, if a polymer is soluble ia a solvent, it is soluble ia all proportions. As solvent evaporates from the solution, no phase separation or precipitation occurs. The solution viscosity iacreases continually until a coherent film is formed. The film is held together by molecular entanglements and secondary bonding forces. The solubiUty of the acrylate polymers is affected by the nature of the side group. Polymers that contain short side chaias are relatively polar and are soluble ia polar solvents such as ketones, esters, or ether alcohols. As the side chaia iacreases ia length the polymers are less polar and dissolve ia relatively nonpolar solvents, such as aromatic or aUphatic hydrocarbons. 

Post-heat treatment of glass induces phase separation and crystalliza tion A very precise secondary heat treatment is necessary to develop and control photochromic properties. Glass-ceramics receive a thermal ceramming process that induces crystallization... 

For extraction of uranium from sulfate leach Hquors, alkyl phosphoric acids, alkyl phosphates, and secondary and tertiary alkyl amines are used in an inert diluent such as kerosene. The formation of a third phase is suppressed by addition of modifiers such as long-chain alcohols or neutral phosphate esters. Such compounds also increase the solubihty of the amine salt in the diluent and improve phase separation. 

The application of this procedure is best seen by performing an FMEA on a simple two-phase separator. Table 14-3 lists those process upsets that can be sensed before an undesirable event leading to a source of condition occurs. For overpressure, primary protection is provided by a high pressure sensor that shuts in the inlet (PSH). If this device fails, secondary protection is provided by a relief valve (PSV). 

In the case of the higher temperature crystallization, as will be shown in Sect. 4, the theory of Doi et al. is applicable without doubt since the primary phase separation involves the transition from the isotropic to nematic phase, but in the case of the glass crystallization near Tg described above its applicability is unclear since the observed data may correspond to the secondary phase separation. However, if the secondary phase separation occurs, the primary phase separation must have proceeded prior to that. In a rapidly quenched glass even if the primary phase separation had already taken place, it would be still incomplete, so that it will re-start by heating. 

Therefore, in the case of glass crystallization just above Tg we may possibly see a secondary phase separation of the spinodal decomposition (SD) type occurring inside the dense region caused by the first SD. 

Fig. 25 Annealing time evolution of the difference SAXS intensity in the induction period (a) and the crystallization period (b) for the melt crystallization of PET at 244 °C [18]. This system corresponds to crystallization from the metastable state where a nucle-ation and growth type of primary phase separation first occurs followed by the spinodal decomposition type secondary phase separation...

PVA and TaM -for the 88%-hydrolyzed PVA. The same dependence was found for the adsorbed layer thickness measured by viscosity and photon correlation spectroscopy. Extension of the adsorption isotherms to higher concentrations gave a second rise in surface concentration, which was attributed to multilayer adsorption and incipient phase separation at the interface. The latex particle size had no effect on the adsorption density however, the thickness of the adsorbed layer increased with increasing particle size, which was attributed to changes in the configuration of the adsorbed polymer molecules. The electrolyte stability of the bare and PVA-covered particles showed that the bare particles coagulated in the primary minimum and the PVA-covered particles flocculated in the secondary minimum and the larger particles were less stable than the smaller particles. 

Phase separation through NG mechanism cannot be observed for polymer-polymer blend systems that show interfacial tension lying in the range 0.5-11 mN/m. In addition, they predicted that a secondary phase separation could take place inside dispersed rubber particles in the case when the average composition of dispersed domains lies in the unstable region at the end of the phase separation [2], They were not able to observe a phase separation inside dispersed domains with TEM micrographs however, they concluded that there are two phases inside the dispersed domains by the fact that the glass transition temperature of the rubber-... 

---