Perturbation theory ensemble

Free energy calculations rely on the following thermodynamic perturbation theory [6-8]. Consider a system A described by the energy function = 17 + T. 17 = 17 (r ) is the potential energy, which depends on the coordinates = (Fi, r, , r ), and T is the kinetic energy, which (in a Cartesian coordinate system) depends on the velocities v. For concreteness, the system could be made up of a biomolecule in solution. We limit ourselves (mostly) to a classical mechanical description for simplicity and reasons of space. In the canonical thermodynamic ensemble (constant N, volume V, temperature T), the classical partition function Z is proportional to the configurational integral Q, which in a Cartesian coordinate system is... 

All discussions of transport processes currently available in the literature are based on perturbation theory methods applied to kinetic pictures of micro-scattering processes within the macrosystem of interest. These methods do involve time-dependent hamiltonians in the sense that the interaction operates only during collisions, while the wave functions are known only before and after the collision. However these interactions are purely internal, and their time-dependence is essentially implicit the over-all hamiltonian of the entire system, such as the interaction term in Eq. (8-159) is not time-dependent, and such micro-scattering processes cannot lead to irreversible changes of thermodynamic (ensemble average) properties. 

We consider an ensemble of reactants in the reduced state situated at the interface. Their concentration is kept constant by an efficient means of transport. We denote the perturbation describing the interaction between one reactant and the electrode by M(r,R). According to time-dependent first-order perturbation theory, the probability per unit time that a reactant will pass from the initial to the final state is ... 

There are also some unexpected problems, related to the fact that the stationarity conditions do not discriminate between ground and excited states, between pure states and ensemble states, and not even between fermions and bosons. The IBQ give only information about the nondiagonal elements of y and the Xk, whereas for the diagonal elements other sources of information must be used. These elements are essentially determined by the requirement of w-representability. This can be imposed exactly to the leading order of perturbation theory. Some information on the diagonal elements is obtained from the lCSE,t, though in a very expensive and hence not recommended way. The best way to take care of -representability is probably via a unitary Fock-space transformation of the reference function, because this transformation preserves the -representability. 

The theory of spectral moments and line shape is based on time-dependent perturbation theory, Eqs. 2.85 and 2.86, applied to ensembles of atoms, or equivalently on the Heisenberg formalism involving dipole autocorrelation functions, Eq. 2.90. 

S. A. Rice I agree with Prof. Kohler that the use of a density matrix formalism by Wilson and co-workers generalizes the optimal control treatment based on wave functions so that it can be applied to, for example, a thermal ensemble of initial states. All of the applications of that formalism I have seen are based on perturbation theory, which is less general than the optimal control scheme that has been developed by Kosloff, Rice, et al. and by Rabitz et al. Incidentally, the use of perturbation theory is not to be despised. Brumer and Shapiro have shown that the perturbation theory results can be used up to 20% product yield. Moreover, from the point of view of generating an optimal control held, the perturbation theory result can be used as a first guess, for which purpose it is very good. 

We here define our model and present a self-contained introduction to perturbation theory, deriving the Feynman graph representation of the cluster expansion. To deal with solutions of finite concentration we introduce the grand-canonical ensemble and resum the cluster expansion to construct the loop expansion. We Lhen show that without further insight the expansions can be applied only in the (9-region or for concentrated solutions since they diverge term by term in the excluded volume limit. 

The first of these developments is perturbation theory. Its application to solution theory was perhaps first made by H. C. Longuet-Higgins in his conformal solution theory (Longuet-Higgins 1951). The formal theory of statistical mechanical perturbation theory is very simple in the canonical ensemble. If denotes the intermo-lecular potential energy of a classical A-body system (not necessarily the sum of pair potentials), the central problem is to evaluate the partition function. 

In this limit, the loop approximation for a grand polymolecular ensemble must give the same results as docs the perturbation theory of monomolecular chains. 

Theoretical studies, like first-principles calculations, grand canonical ensemble Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations, second order Moller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2) calculations and density functional theory (DFT) calculations, have been utilized to investigate optimal structures and their properties. Combined experimental and theoretical data provide a window to the plan of design of these network structures and lead to a new direction to investigate porous networks. 

The case of electrical conduction is somewhat more straightforward. In Kubo s analysis an external electric field is introduced and the resulting electric current calculated by perturbation theory the result (214) follows without the necessity of introducing the restriction (194). Thus Kubo s formula appears to be valid even when quantum fluctuations are large, although then one may question whether the use of a statistical ensemble is legitimate. 

The Gibbs free energy of hydration, AGx(aq), was calculated using the MC simulation coupled to the thermodynamic perturbation theory (TPT) [41-43], in which a series of MC runs is carried out. A system with one solute molecule and 1000 water molecules at normal conditions in the NpT ensemble was used for the TPT calculations. The... 

On less formal grounds a Markovian type of equation was also obtained by Redfield [167]. Redheld used perturbation theory up to second order and derived a Master equation for the evolution of the density matrix Oaa y where a, a denote quantum states of the molecule with energy defined by ha. The simple equation for the relaxation of the density matrix was obtained by neglecting the ensemble-averaged first-order terms. Thus we have [167]... 

---