Performing the Experiment

The F-factors of 5.0 and 8.0 are cousei vative in the opinion of the researcher who performed the experiments (private communication from E. I. dll Pout de Nemours Co., Inc., to the DIERS Project). 

The advantages of SEXAFS/NEXAFS can be negated by the inconvenience of having to travel to synchrotron radiation centers to perform the experiments. This has led to attempts to exploit EXAFS-Iike phenomena in laboratory-based techniques, especially using electron beams. Despite doubts over the theory there appears to be good experimental evidence that electron energy loss fine structure (EELFS) yields structural information in an identical manner to EXAFS. However, few EELFS experiments have been performed, and the technique appears to be more raxing than SEXAFS. 

The introduction of various empirical corrections, such as scale factors for frequencies and energy corrections based on the number of electrons and degree of spin contamination, blurs the distinction between whether they should be considered ab initio, or as belonging to the semi-empirical class of methods, such as AMI and PM3. Nevertheless, the accuracy tiiat tiiese methods are capable of delivering makes it possible to calculate absolute stabilities (heat of formation) for small and medium sized systems which rival (or surpass) experimental data, often at a substantial lower cost than for actually performing the experiments. 

Materials List all laboratory equipment and other materials needed to perform the experiment. 

Procedure Describe each step of the procedure so that someone else could perform the experiment following your directions. 

Step 5. Perform the experiment at the selected experimental conditions. 

The work at the University of Illinois was funded in part by the Department of Energy under contract DE AC02 83ER60186. We would also like to express our thanks to Ted Davis of the Denver Research Center for his assistance in performing the experiments in the Denver radon chamber. 

IHC was ripe for Dr. Shi s equally unconventional idea, and the time was ripe to perform the experiment. The outcome we all now know. Many antigens can be retrieved. I have come to think of AR as unfixation, and by the use of AR, IHC has become more straightforward and more widespread. 

The authors wish to thank the following individuals for performing the experiments Mr. David A. Bulpett of AMTL (PY-GC-MS experiments), Ms. Claudette LeCroy of AMTL (Oxygen Index experiments) and Mr. Stephen D. Ogden of FMRC (experiments in the FMRC s Small-Scale Flammability Apparatus). 

Choice of experimental strategy to follow in light of points (1) to (3) (i.e., how to perform the experiments and the number and type required). 

That boiling produces bubbles of vapor creates an additional problem for performing the experiment. If a bubble of gas forms at the bottom of a capillary tube, its expansion and rise to the top of the capillary will expel the rest of the liquid. This is due to the fact that the surface tension of most liquids combined with the narrow bore of the capillary will not allow fluid to drain around the bubble as it rises. The solution is that a larger sample tube and sample is required for the experiment. One advantage of the boiling point experiment is that the thermal conductivity of a liquid is higher than its solid because of the mobility of the molecules. 

In an acid-base titration you may either add acid to base or base to acid. This addition continues until there is some indication that the reaction is complete. Often a chemical known as an indicator will indicate the endpoint of a titration reaction, the experimental end of the titration. If we perform the experiment well, the endpoint should closely match the equivalence point of the titration, the theoretical end of the reaction. All the calculations in this section assume accurate experimental determination of the endpoint, and that this value is the same as the equivalence point. 

Another method for determining the activation energy involves using a modification of the Arrhenius equation. If we try to use the Arrhenius equation directly, we have one equation with two unknowns (the frequency factor and the activation energy). The rate constant and the temperature are experimental values, while R is a constant. One way to prevent this difficulty is to perform the experiment twice. We determine experimental values of the rate constant at two different temperatures. We then assume that the frequency factor is the same at these two temperatures. We now have a new equation derived from the Arrhenius equation that allows us to calculate the activation energy. This equation is ... 

In order to explain the formation of the product 9 during oxidation at two different potentials we have performed the experiments with cyclic voltammetry [45]. The cyclic voltammogram of catechol (QH2) exhibits the anodic wave at 0.25 V vs SCE (Fig. la) corresponding to the formation of o-quinone (Q) which is reduced in the cathodic sweep at 0.05 V vs SCE. The cathodic counterpart of the anodic peak disappears, when a sufficient amount of 4-hydroxycoumarin was added, and a second irreversible peak at 0.95 V vs SCE appeared (Fig. lb). 

The time that we were moving through seemed made of the reflections of what had preceded it and what was to follow. The first night of my decision not to sleep, March 6, was passed in deep reverie and a growing amazement that I was actually functioning without any apparent need of sleep. In the last of the darkness before dawn, at a time I felt matched exactly the time when we performed the experiment two days before, I... 

I felt this way although I knew nothing about how he had performed the experiment or discovered the theory. I knew only that from that dawn moment when we looked at the mushroom immediately after the experiment something very bizarre had happened to me. 

---