Particle roughness

Sample requirements Solid conductors and insulators typically, <2.5 cm in diameter, and < 1 cm thick, polished flat particles, rough surfaces, and thin films... 

In practice the friction factors are calculated either by integration of Eq. (4.51) or by reference to a Moody chart. This is based on Eq. (4.51) by using equivalent roughness values representing the sand particle roughness (see Table 4.3). 

Increasing the concentration of particles (roughly for a volume fraction approaching 10%), the stress concentration effects of neighboring particles can overlap (Fig. 13.2). Therefore, a large volume fraction of the matrix supports an average load higher than the applied load and can yield. This stress concentration effect increases when the volume fraction of dispersed particles increases or the interparticle distance decreases. 

At the contact points of particles roughness peaks may melt due to heat caused by friction and/or pressure. In such a case liquid bridges develop which solidify quickly if no further energy is supplied. This mechanism, called partial melting, is often responsible for unwanted agglomeration and caking of substances with low melting points. 

The deposit mass and relative build-up rates for the pulverizer rejects are given in Table IX. The ash deposits were collected over a period of only 90 seconds. Once the sintered mass was removed, there remained a strongly bonded deposit of primarily iron-rich particles, roughly 1 mm thick and 8 mm in diameter. The composition... 

Fig. 5.n Model depicting the true situation at a coordination point between two particles. Roughness exists on all real particles, o is the representative distance between the particles. 

Hollow tubes extracted from the silica/alumina clay halloysite exist naturally as particles roughly 500 nm long, and they do not have the exfoliation issues of platy nanoclays. Thus, these nanofillers do not require the same specialized equipment and processing that nanoclays require for proper dispersal. As fillers, nanotubes provide high properties because of their very high aspect ratios. 

However, the average particle radius is not the only or even the most important driving force for mass transport. The nature of the atoms, the particle roughness, face indexes, and defect properties of the surfaces and grain boundaries contribute to the sinter rates to an extent that depends on the particular compound. These factors are less easily quantified than particle radii and are therefore often ignored in the literature on sintering. 

---