Parameter Kohlrausch-Williams-Watts

The considered model of a straight line of M nanoparticles illustrates only general features of dielectric losses caused by an M nanoparticle cluster in polymer matrix. Actually such cluster is a complex fractal system. Analysis of dielectric relaxation parameters of this process allowed the determination of fractal properties of the percolation cluster [104], The dielectric response for this process in the time domain can be described by the Kohlrausch-Williams-Watts (KWW) expression... 

The stretched-exponential temporal response of Eq. (63), Section 2.1, a versatile and theoretically plausible correlation function, is one whose corresponding frequency behavior is now called Kohlrausch-Williams-Watts or just Kohlrausch [1854] model response, denoted here by Kk. It is also now customary to replace the a of the stretched-exponential equation by P or P, with A =D or 0. The k=D choice may be related to KD-model dispersive frequency response involving a distribution of dielectric relaxation (properly retardation ) times, and the A = 0 and 1 choices to two different distributions of resistivity relaxation times and thus to KO and K1-model responses, respectively. Note that the P parameter of the important K1 model is not directly related to stretched exponential temporal response, as are the other Kohlrausch models, but the DRTs of the KO and K1 models are closely related (Macdonald [1997a]). Further, although the KD and KO models are identical in form, they apply at different immittance levels and so represent distinct response behaviors. 

Autocorrelation decay functions calculated on the basis of Eq. (44) for different values of the intermoiecular coupling parameter y arc presented in Fig. 4. The ordinate is log[ — In M (x)] and the abscissa is Iog(xX abdi taken as unity. This choice of the coordinates allows direct com rison with the empirical stretched exponential or the Kohlrausch-Williams-Watt (KWW) function [93, 94]... 

These relationships are known as the Debye formulae. The Debye process has a relaxation time distribution, which is symmetrical around /niax= niax/2n and has a full width at half-maximum of 1.14 decades in frequency for the dielectric loss. In most cases, the half width of measured loss peaks is much broader than the predicted by eqn [26] and in addition, their shapes are asymmetric and with a high-frequency tail. This is the non-Debye (or nonideal) relaxation behavior found in many glass formers. In the literature, several empirical model funaions, mostly generalization of the Debye function, have been developed and tested which are able to describe broadened and/or asymmetric loss peaks. Among these empirical model functions, the most important are the Kohlrausch-Williams-Watts (KWW), Cole-Cole (CC), Cole-Davidson (CD), and the Havriliak-Negami (HN) function. The HN function, with two shape parameters, is the most commonly used funaion in the frequency domain. 

Here tq is the relaxation time at equilibrium (Tf = T) at high temperatures, x is a structural parameter and measure of nonlinearity, with values 0 < x < 1, and AE is the activation energy for the relaxation processes and has an Arrhenius temperature dependence. The models also use the stretched exponential function of Kohlrausch, Williams, and Watts [1970] (KWW) to describe the distribution of relaxation times as... 

---