Parallel capacity units operation

Impact of Many Capacity Units Operating in Parallel... 

Consider a system consisting of me independent capacity units operating in parallel, all capable of providing service to an arriving stream of orders, which are processed in order of arrival. Orders are allocated to the first available unit of capacity. Assume (as before) that the service time is exponentially distributed. The arrival of orders to the system has an interarrival time that is exponential with parameter X. As stated earlier, from a theoretical perspective, this model of order arrivals approximates the combination of many independent order sources. 

Parallel System Term used to indicate a system architecture in which 100% power is supplied by all Brayton units operating at a reduced capacity, but in the event of failure(s), full power can be supplied by fewer Braytons. 

For the same production capacity, the oxygen-based process requires fewer reactors, all of which operate in parallel and are exposed to reaction gas of the same composition. However, the use of purge reactors in series for an air-based process in conjunction with the associated energy recovery system increases the overall complexity of the unit. Given the same degree of automation, the operation of an oxygen-based unit is simpler and easier if the air-separation plant is outside the battery limits of the ethylene oxide process (97). 

Capacity Control The simplest way to regulate the capacity of most steam vacuum refrigeration systems is to furnish several primary boosters in parallel and operate only those required to handle the heat load. It is not uncommon to have as many as four main boosters on larger units for capacity variation. A simple automatic on-off type of control may be used for this purpose. By sensing the chilled-water temperature leaving the flash tank, a controller can turn steam on and off to each ejector as required. 

This angle plate gravity separator removes suspensions of solids from a dilute liquid. The unit is more compact than a box-type settler due to the increased capacity achiev ed by the multiple parallel plates. The concept is fairly standard (U.S. Patent 1,458.805—year 1923) but there are variations in some details. For effective operation, the unit must receive the mixture with definite particles having a settling velocity. The units are not totally effective for flocculants or coagulated masses that may have a tendency to be buoyant. 

The process has been used in the USA for 25 years, but a large extrapolation of experience was necessary to reach the scale of operation needed for the Canadian nuclear industry. A typical Canadian enriching unit has a nominal capacity of 50 kg D20/h. However, with an overall extraction of about 20% of the deuterium in the feedwater, the total feed rate is about 0.5 metric tons per second. Three large towers are used in parallel. (Table II)... 

The test unit used on Hutton consisted of two single-liner 60-mm [2.4-in.] hydrocydones that could be operated cither in series or parallel. The 35-mm [1.4-in.] cyclones exhibit potentially higher separation forces, but a 60-mm [2.4-in.] unit has approximately 2.5 times the capacity of a 35-mm [1.4-in.] cyclone for the same pressure driving force... 

Natural circulation evaporators like those shown on Figure 8.16 may be equipped for continuous salt removal and thus adapted to crystallization service. For large production rates, however, forced circulation types such as the DTB crystallizer of Figure 16.10(g), with some control of crystal size, are the most often used. The lower limit for economic continuous operation is l-4tons/day of crystals, and the upper limit in a single vessel is 100-300 tons/day, but units in parallel can be used for unlimited capacity. 

---