Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

P-spin

Regardless of how many single-particle wavefiinctions i are available, this number is overwhelmed by the number of n-particle wavefiinctions ( ) (Slater detenninants) that can be constructed from them. For example, if a two-electron system is treated within the Flartree-Fock approximation using 100 basis fiinctions, both of the electrons can be assigned to any of the % obtained m the calculation, resulting in 10,000 two-electron wavefimctions. For water, which has ten electrons, the number of electronic wavefiinctions with equal numbers of a and p spin electrons that can be constructed from 100 single-particle wavefimctions is roughly... [Pg.34]

Flere two electrons occupy the 1 s orbital (with opposite, a and p spins) while the other electron pair resides in 2s-2p polarized orbitals in a maimer that instantaneously correlates their motions. These polarized orbital... [Pg.2164]

In contrast, when acting on a p spin orbital, one obtains... [Pg.2168]

Spin orbitals of a and p type do not experience the same exchange potential in this model because contains two a spin orbitals and only one p spin orbital. A consequence is that the optimal Isa and IsP spin orbitals, which are themselves solutions of p([). = .([)., do not have identical orbital energies (i.e. E p) and are... [Pg.2168]

The normalisation factor is assumed. It is often convenient to indicate the spin of each electron in the determinant this is done by writing a bar when the spin part is P (spin down) a function without a bar indicates an a spin (spin up). Thus, the following are all commonly used ways to write the Slater determinantal wavefunction for the beryllium atom (which has the electronic configuration ls 2s ) ... [Pg.60]

In particular, within the orbital model of eleetronie strueture (whieh is developed more systematieally in Seetion 6), one ean not eonstruet trial waveflmetions whieh are simple spin-orbital produets (i.e., an orbital multiplied by an a or P spin funetion for eaeh eleetron) sueh as lsalsP2sa2sP2pia2poa. Sueh spin-orbital produet funetions must be made permutationally antisymmetrie if the N-eleetron trial funetion is to be properly antisymmetrie. This ean be aeeomplished for any sueh produet wavefunetion by applying the following antisymmetrizer operator ... [Pg.241]

The notation < i j k 1> introduced above gives the two-electron integrals for the g(r,r ) operator in the so-called Dirac notation, in which the i and k indices label the spin-orbitals that refer to the coordinates r and the j and 1 indices label the spin-orbitals referring to coordinates r. The r and r denote r,0,( ),a and r, 0, ( ), a (with a and a being the a or P spin functions). The fact that r and r are integrated and hence represent dummy variables introduces index permutational symmetry into this list of integrals. For example,... [Pg.280]

Spin-orbitals of a and P type do not experience the same exchange potential in this model, which is clearly due to the fact that P contains two a spin-orbitals and only one P spin-orbital. [Pg.462]

One consequence of the spin-polarized nature of the effective potential in F is that the optimal Isa and IsP spin-orbitals, which are themselves solutions of F ( )i = 8i d >i, do not have identical orbital energies (i.e., 8isa lsP) and are not spatially identical to one another (i.e., (l)isa and (l)isp do not have identical LCAO-MO expansion coefficients). This resultant spin polarization of the orbitals in P gives rise to spin impurities in P. That is, the determinant Isa 1 s P 2sa is not a pure doublet spin eigenfunction although it is an eigenfunction with Ms = 1/2 it contains both S = 1/2 and S = 3/2 components. If the Isa and Is P spin-orbitals were spatially identical, then Isa Is P 2sa would be a pure spin eigenfunction with S = 1/2. [Pg.462]

Much of the development of the previous ehapter pertains to the use of a single Slater determinant trial wavefunetion. As presented, it relates to what has been ealled the unrestrieted Hartree-Foek (UHF) theory in whieh eaeh spin-orbital (jti has its own orbital energy 8i and LCAO-MO eoeffieients Cy,i there may be different Cy,i for a spin-orbitals than for P spin-orbitals. Sueh a wavefunetion suffers from the spin eontamination diffieulty detailed earlier. [Pg.481]

A variation on the HF procedure is the way that orbitals are constructed to reflect paired or unpaired electrons. If the molecule has a singlet spin, then the same orbital spatial function can be used for both the a and P spin electrons in each pair. This is called the restricted Hartree-Fock method (RHF). [Pg.20]

The second set of illustrations show the spin density plotted on the electron density isosurface the spin density provides the shading for the isodensity surface dark areas indicate positive (excess a) spin density and light areas indicate negative (excess P) spin density. For example, in the allyl radical, the spin density is concentrated around the two terminal carbons (and away from the central carbon). In the Be form, it is concentrated around the substituent, and in acetyl radical, it is centered around the C2 carbon atom. [Pg.132]

Charle, K. P. Spin-Dependent Kinetics in Dye-Sensitized Charge-Carrier Injection into Organic Crystal Electrodes 19... [Pg.601]

The orbital phase theory is applicable to the singlet diradicals [20]. The electron configuration of the singlet states of the cross- (TMM) and linear (BD) conjugate diradicals is shown in Scheme 9, where the mechanism of the delocalization of a and P spins between the radical centers through the double bond are separately illustrated by the arrows. The cyclic [-a-Tr-b-T -] interaction is readily seen to occur for the spin delocalizations. The p orbital a) in one radical center and the n orbital are occupied by a spins, and therefore, electron-donating orbitals. The p orbital (b) in the other radical center and the ii orbital are not occupied by a spins. [Pg.92]

The delocalization of excessive a- (or P-) spins and the bond polarization can take place among radical orbitals, p and q, and the central n (or o) and n (or o ) orbitals, resulting in the electron transferred configurations (T) and locally excited configurations (E), respectively (Fig. 5a). The delocalization-polarization mechanisms are different between singlet and triplet states, as addressed in the following subsections. [Pg.227]

There was no evidence for the alternative diphosphinoamines, R2P-N(Y)-PR2, in the P n.m.r. spectra, which revealed relatively large P-P spin-spin coupling constants (225—300 Hz), characteristic of directly-bonded phosphorus atoms. It is interesting to note that the two groups of compounds gave different types of sulphide on reaction with sulphur ... [Pg.194]

Figure 4.44 Leading donor-acceptor interactions (p spin set) from a sigma-type oxygen lone pair to unfilled manganese valence orbitals of (a) s-type and (b) d-type in [Mn(H20)6]2+ (cf. Fig. 4.43). Figure 4.44 Leading donor-acceptor interactions (p spin set) from a sigma-type oxygen lone pair to unfilled manganese valence orbitals of (a) s-type and (b) d-type in [Mn(H20)6]2+ (cf. Fig. 4.43).
The phenomenon of electron pairing is a consequence of the Pauli exclusion principle. The physical consequences of this principle are made manifest through the spatial properties of the density of the Fermi hole. The Fermi hole has a simple physical interpretation - it provides a description of how the density of an electron of given spin, called the reference electron, is spread out from any given point, into the space of another same-spin electron, thereby excluding the presence of an identical amount of same-spin density. If the Fermi hole is maximally localized in some region of space all other same-spin electrons are excluded from this region and the electron is localized. For a closed-shell molecule the same result is obtained for electrons of p spin and the result is a localized a,p pair [46]. [Pg.225]

The magnetic moments of the Ni clusters are dominated by the contribution from surface atoms.48,69 The analysis of Wan et al. indicates that the orbital and spin local moments of cluster atoms with atomic coordination 8 or larger are similar to those in the bulk (p spin 0.55 and orb 0.05 pB) 73 that is, the orbital moment is almost quenched for internal cluster atoms. In contrast, there is a large enhancement of the spin and orbital moments for atoms with coordination less than 8. This enhancement increases with the coordination deficit, and it is larger for the orbital moment. Wan et al.48 also analyzed the quantum confinement effect proposed by Fujima and Yamaguchi,56 i.e., the... [Pg.224]


See other pages where P-spin is mentioned: [Pg.1609]    [Pg.2162]    [Pg.2168]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.459]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.905]    [Pg.967]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.188]   


SEARCH



P, spin function

P,T-odd spin-rotational Hamiltonian

© 2024 chempedia.info