Ordering, covalent-bond electronic

The process of O2 + 4e" —> 20, abstract free electrons from the free electron band and results in upsetting the ratio of R = N 7 Nc (number of free electrons over number of covalent bonded electrons). In order to restore this ratio, some covalent bond (particularly those near the surface) will have to give up their covalent bonding to become positive ions. In this process free electrons are created ... 

Consider now the behaviour of the HF wave function 0 (eq. (4.18)) as the distance between the two nuclei is increased toward infinity. Since the HF wave function is an equal mixture of ionic and covalent terms, the dissociation limit is 50% H+H " and 50% H H. In the gas phase all bonds dissociate homolytically, and the ionic contribution should be 0%. The HF dissociation energy is therefore much too high. This is a general problem of RHF type wave functions, the constraint of doubly occupied MOs is inconsistent with breaking bonds to produce radicals. In order for an RHF wave function to dissociate correctly, an even-electron molecule must break into two even-electron fragments, each being in the lowest electronic state. Furthermore, the orbital symmetries must match. There are only a few covalently bonded systems which obey these requirements (the simplest example is HHe+). The wrong dissociation limit for RHF wave functions has several consequences. 

A covalent bond will exhibit polarity when it is formed from atoms that differ in electronegativity, i.e., the ability to attract electrons. The order of electronegativity of some elements [50, p. 16] is... 

In order to explain the observed saturation ferromagnetic moment of Fe, 2.22/xb, I assumed that the Fe atom in the metal has two kinds of 3d orbitals 2.22 atomic (contracted) orbitals, and 2.78 bonding 3d orbitals, which can hybridize with 4s and 4p to form bond orbitals. Thus 2.22 of the 8 outer electrons could occupy the atomic orbitals to provide the ferromagnetic moment, with the other 5.78 outer electrons forming 5.78 covalent bonds. 

Three pairs of electrons must be shared in order that each nitrogen atom has an octet of electrons. The formation of strong covalent bonds between nitrogen atoms in N2 is responsible for the relative inertness of nitrogen gas. 

Since covalent bonding is localized, and forms open crystal structures (diamond, zincblende, wurtzite, and the like) dislocation mobility is very different than in pure metals. In these crystals, discrete electron-pair bonds must be disrupted in order for dislocations to move. 

In order for a pair of electrons to be donated from a ligand to a metal ion, there must be an empty orbital on the metal ion to accept the pair of electrons. This situation is quite different from that where covalent bonds are being formed because in that case, one electron in a bonding pair comes from each of the atoms held by the bond. One of the first factors to be described in connection with the formation of coordinate bonds is that of seeing what type(s) of orbitals are available on the metal. If the metal... 

The outer shell of the helium atom is full and complete the shell can only accept two electrons and, indeed, is occupied by two electrons. Similarly, argon has a complete octet of electrons in its outer shell. Further reaction would increase the number of electrons if argon were to undergo a covalent bond or become an anion, or would decrease the number of electrons below the perfect eight if a cation were to form. There is no impetus for reaction because the monatomic argon is already at its position of lowest energy, and we recall that bonds form in order to decrease the energy. 

As described above for molecular oxygen or nitrogen, it is possible to have more than one bond between atoms (up to a maximum of three for orbital reasons). Bond order is simply the number of pairs of electrons shared between two atoms (remember there are two electrons per covalent bond). As the bond order increases the distance between the atoms decreases and the energy required to break the bonds increases. 

Some molecules exist where the bonding electrons cannot be assigned to atom pairs, but belong to more than two cores, e.g. in the polyboranes. In these cases the model concept of covalently bound atom pairs as a rep-resention basis for chemical constitution using binary relations can be sustained by the assignment of fractional bond orders. 

To describe the EMs, Ugi uses the so-called BE-matrices (from Bond and Electron), the diagonal entries of which are the number of free valence electrones and the off-diagonal are the formal covalent bond orders. The sum of all the elements of a row (or a column, since all BE-matrices are symmetrical, i.e., they have the same number of rows than columns) give the total number of electrons surrounding the atom associated to this row. In fact, the n atoms of an EM can be enumerated in n different ways, which would lead to n distinguishable but equivalent BE matrices. However, by appropiate rules one of these numberings can be considered canonical. 

The same principles that are valid for the surface of crystalline substances hold for the surface of amorphous solids. Crystals can be of the purely ionic type, e.g., NaF, or of the purely covalent type, e.g., diamond. Most substances, however, are somewhere in between these extremes [even in lithium fluoride, a slight tendency towards bond formation between cations and anions has been shown by precise determinations of the electron density distribution (/)]. Mostly, amorphous solids are found with predominantly covalent bonds. As with liquids, there is usually some close-range ordering of the atoms similar to the ordering in the corresponding crystalline structures. Obviously, this is caused by the tendency of the atoms to retain their normal electron configuration, such as the sp hybridization of silicon in silica. Here, too, transitions from crystalline to amorphous do occur. The microcrystalline forms of carbon which are structurally descended from graphite are an example. 

---