Particle orbitals

The muon is about two hundred times heavier than the electron and its orbit lies 200 times closer to the nucleus. The nuclear structure effects scale with the mass of the orbiting particle as m3R2 (for the Lamb shift It is a characteristic value of the nuclear size) and as m R2 (for the hyperfine structure), while the linewidth is linear in m. That means, that from a purely atomic point of view the muonic atoms offer a way to measure the nuclear contribution with a higher accuracy than normal atoms. However, there are a number of problems with formation and thermalization of these atoms and with their collisions with the buffer gas. 

The muon is about two hundred times heavier than the electron and its orbit lies 200 times closer to the nucleus. The nuclear structure effects scale with the mass of the orbiting particle as (for the Lamb shift ii is a characteristic... 

FIG. 11.4. (a) Angular momentum caused by an orbiting particle and permitted value projected on the external field axis. The vector p, processes around the field axis as indicated by the dashed circle (ell se in the drawing), (b) The l-s coqtling of orbital angular momentum and spin leads to a resultant angular momentum pj. 

VI. Sum each upgoing line independently over all unoccupied spin orbitals (particle states), and each downgoing line independently over all occupied spin orbitals (hole states). 

Bohr modeled electrons as negatively charged, orbiting particles restricted to certain distances from the nucleus. However, in the early 1900s, a new model for the atom, called the quantum mechanical model, was developed. Although the Bohr model is useful for explaining much of the chemical behavior we encounter in this book, it leaves us with an outdated picture for how electrons exist in atoms. A brief introduction to the quantum mechanical model can give us a more modem picture of the atom. 

The Bohr atomic model, which describes an electron as an orbiting particle, is well known to fail for all atoms other than hydrogen. Maxima in the optimization function should therefore not be interpreted as orbits but rather as the nodes of a spherical standing wave in line with the periodic table of the elements. 

If the orbiting particle is positively charged, the magnetic moment is in the same direction as the angular momentum, and if it is negatively charged, the magnetic moment is in the opposite direction. 

The second term in Eq. (E-15) produces a rate of change in p if does not depend on p. This represents the centrifugal force, which is not a force, but an expression of the natural tendency of an orbiting particle to move off in a straight line. To maintain a circular orbit about the origin of coordinates, the seeond term must be canceled by a centripetal force ... 

It is interesting to note that the Stokes number that we present above, and which we can readily derive from an elementary force balance on an equilibrium orbiting particle, multiplied by the velocity ratio is simply equal to the ratio of drag to inertial forces acting upon the particle. 

Although a separation of electronic and nuclear motion provides an important simplification and appealing qualitative model for chemistry, the electronic Sclirodinger equation is still fomiidable. Efforts to solve it approximately and apply these solutions to the study of spectroscopy, stmcture and chemical reactions fonn the subject of what is usually called electronic structure theory or quantum chemistry. The starting point for most calculations and the foundation of molecular orbital theory is the independent-particle approximation. 

A superb treatment of applied molecular orbital theory and its application to organic, inorganic and solid state chemistry. Perhaps the best source for appreciating the power of the independent-particle approximation and its remarkable ability to account for qualitative behaviour in chemical systems. 

It would appear that identical particle pemuitation groups are not of help in providing distinguishing syimnetry labels on molecular energy levels as are the other groups we have considered. However, they do provide very usefiil restrictions on the way we can build up the complete molecular wavefiinction from basis fiinctions. Molecular wavefiinctions are usually built up from basis fiinctions that are products of electronic and nuclear parts. Each of these parts is fiirther built up from products of separate uncoupled coordinate (or orbital) and spin basis fiinctions. Wlien we combine these separate fiinctions, the final overall product states must confonn to the pemuitation syimnetry mles that we stated above. This leads to restrictions in the way that we can combine the uncoupled basis fiinctions. 

H at m energy of 1.2 eV in the center-of-mass frame. By using an atomic orbital basis and a representation of the electronic state of the system in terms of a Thouless determinant and the protons as classical particles, the leading term of the electronic state of the reactants is... 

---