Orbitals, chemical conventions

A particularly useful property of the PX monomer is its enthalpy of formation. Conventional means of obtaining this value, such as through its heat of combustion, are, of course, excluded by its reactivity. An experimental attempt was made to obtain this measure of chemical reactivity with the help of ion cyclotron resonance a value of 209 17 kJ/mol (50 4 kcal/mol) was obtained (10). Unfortunately, the technique suffers from lack of resolution in addition to experimental imprecision. It is perhaps better to rely on molecular orbital calculations for the formation enthalpy. Using a semiempirical molecular orbital technique, which is tuned to give good values for heat of formation on experimentally accessible compounds, the heat of formation of /5-xylylene has been computed to be 234.8 kj/mol (56.1 kcal/mol) (11). 

It is clear that the density matrix formalism renders a considerable simplification of the basis for the quantum theory of many-particle systems. It emphasizes points of essential physical and chemical interests, and it avoids more artificial or conventional ideas, as for instance different types of basic orbitals. The question is, however, whether this formalism can be separated from the wave function idea itself as a fundament. Research on this point is in progress, and one can expect some interesting results within the next few years. 

The conventional chemical nomenclature for these orbitals is given on the right hand side, and the X-ray nomenclature used in Auger spectroscopy appears on the left. The designation of levels to the K, L, M,... shells is based on their having principal quantum numbers of 1,2,3,... respectively. 

From 1933 85>, several theoretical approaches to the problem of the chemical reactivity of planar conjugated molecules began to appear, mainly by the Huckel molecular orbital theory. These were roughly divided into two groups 36>. The one was called the "static approach 35,37-40)j and the other, the "localization approach 41,42). in 1952, another method which was referred to as the "frontier-electron method was proposed 43> and was conventionally grouped 44> together with other related methods 45 48> as the "delocalization approach". 

Figure 3.11 Conventional representations of the shapes of the p orbitals. They are used as approximate representations of both ip and tp2. The sign of tp is indicated by the shading. (Reproduced with permission from and M. J. Winter, Chemical Bonding, 1994, Oxford University Press, Oxford.)...

The dimension of the secular determinant for a given molecule depends on the choice of basis set. EHT adopts two critical conventions. First, all core electrons are ignored. It is assumed that core electrons are sufficiently invariant to differing chemical environments that changes in their orbitals as a function of environment are of no chemical consequence, energetic or otherwise. All modern semiempirical methodologies make this approximation. In EHT calculations, if an atom has occupied d orbitals, typically the highest occupied level of d orbitals is considered to contribute to the set of valence orbitals. 

In writing the conventional Lewis structures for molecules, we assume that a covalent chemical bond between two atoms involves sharing of a pair of electrons, one from each atom. Figure 6-5 shows how atomic orbitals can be considered to be used in bond formation. Here, we postulate that a single bond is formed by the pulling together of two atomic nuclei by attractive forces exerted by the nuclei for the two paired electrons in overlapping atomic orbitals. 

---