Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Occupiers Liability Acts 1957 and

In addition, the Occupiers Liability Acts, 1957 and 1984, impose a duty of care on the occupier of premises—that is the person or body in control of the premises—for the safety of visitors. This requires measures to be taken to ensure that lawful visitors are safe when using the premises for the agreed purpose of the visit. Teachers must thus ensure that they and the pupils, as visitors, work within a safe environment during their lessons and other sanctioned activities by reporting any faults to the head teacher so that the governing body or LEA, as occupiers , may take action. [Pg.44]

Occupiers also have a duty under the Occupiers Liability Acts 1957 and 1984. The original 1957 Act places a duty upon those in control of premises to ensure that any visitor is reasonably safe, having been invited or permitted by the occupier to be there. This duty includes children for whom there is a higher duty of care. The Act does also require that any person on site also acts in a reasonable manner. [Pg.9]

The common law duty of care owed to visitors by an occupier in respect of premises is now statutory and was clarified in the Occupier s Liability Act 1957 which ended the previous (often subtle) distinction between persons invited to enter (called invitees) and those allowed to enter (licensees), a distinction which previously affected the standard of duty. Under the 1957 Act, both categories are visitors to whom an occupier owes the common duty of care once the relationship of occupier and visitor is established. The duty is to take such care as in all the circumstances of the case is reasonable to see that the visitor will be reasonably safe in using the premises for the purposes for which he is invited or permitted to be there. An example is Cunningham V. Reading Football Clulfi. Due to the football club s failure to maintain its terraces, football hooligans were able to use lumps of masonry as missiles. A policeman on duty at the club was injured and successfully sued that club. [Pg.43]

Occupational Safety and Health Act 1970 (USA) 429 Occupier s Liability Act 1957 90,154,161,165 Occupier s Liability Act 1984 43, 90, 91,154,165 Packaging Essential Requirements Regulations 1998 922 Packaging, Labelling and Carriage of Radioactive Material by Rail Regulations 1996 842... [Pg.991]

The responsibility of occupiers of land to those who legally enter the premises is to be found in the Occupier s Liability Acts of 1957 and 1984. The 1957 Act covers both tortious and contractual liability. The basic obligation is that the occupier owes a common duty of care to see that the premises are reasonably safe for the purpose for which the visitor has been permitted to enter (s. 2). It is possible of course for any contract that may exist between the occupier and the visitor to state a higher duty of care than that of s. 2. But under the Act it was possible for the occupier to exclude this... [Pg.86]


See other pages where Occupiers Liability Acts 1957 and is mentioned: [Pg.367]    [Pg.482]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.482]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.735]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.91]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.482 ]




SEARCH



Liability

Liability occupiers

Occupiers Liability Acts

© 2024 chempedia.info