Numerical modeling three dimensions

The method for simulating polymer flooding presented here, while similar in many ways to previous techniques, differs in several respects. Bondor et al." solve the fluid flow equations numerically in three dimensions, consider three-phase flow, and simulate thickened water as a fourth phase. They do not, however, simulate the dependence of retention and resistance factors on permeability, nor do they consider degradation. Jewett and Schurz describe a layered model with retention and resistance factors dependent on permeability, but do not include capillarity, crossflow, or gravity effects. 

The principal numerical problem associated with the solution of (7) is that lengthy calculations are required to integrate several coupled nonlinear equations in three dimensions. However, models based on a fixed coordinate approach may be used to predict pollutant concentrations at all points of interest in the airshed at any time. This is in contrast to moving cell methods, wherein predictions are confined to the paths along which concentration histories are computed. 

To proceed, we need the dispersion relation m = t>( A ) in three dimensions. At this point one can either resort to numerical evaluation of this function, or to a simple model constructed according to available data and physical insight. In the next section we take the second route. 

The MAC method, which allows arbitrary free surface flows to be simulated, is widely used and can be readily extended to three dimensions. Its drawback lies in the fact that it is computationally demanding to trace a large number of particles, especially in 3D simulation. In addition, it may result in some regions void of particles because the density of particles is finite. The impact of the MAC method is much beyond its interface capmring scheme. The staggered mesh layout and other features of MAC have become a standard model for many other Eulerian codes (even numerical techniques involving mono-phase flows). 

The William T. Fine System A Three Dimension Numerical Risk Scoring Model... 

Chemical waves are easiest to think about, and to simulate numerically, in a medium that has one spatial dimension, such as a very narrow tube. The wave-front consists of a single point or a very narrow interval where concentrations jump from one nearly constant level to another. The wave profile in space resembles the concentration vs. time profile for the homogeneous reaction. Mathematical treatment of such systems is relatively straightforward, either analytically or numerically. Waves in three dimensions, which we shall discuss briefly later in this chapter, are extremely difficult to obtain experimentally, and far harder to model computationally. The intermediate case, waves in a two-dimensional system, is one that occurs frequently in nature, can easily be created in the laboratory by studying thin layers of solution in a Petri dish, and allows a certain... 

---