Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Nuclei parameters

To overcome the primary weakness of GTO fimetions (i.e. their radial derivatives vanish at the nucleus whereas the derivatives of STOs are non-zero), it is coimnon to combine two, tliree, or more GTOs, with combination coefficients which are fixed and not treated as LCAO-MO parameters, into new functions called contracted GTOs or CGTOs. Typically, a series of tight, medium, and loose GTOs are multiplied by contraction coefficients and suimned to produce a CGTO, which approximates the proper cusp at the nuclear centre. [Pg.2170]

There are some bonndary conditions which can be used to fix parameters A, and Aj. For example, when the distance between nucleus A and n nclens B approaches zero, i.e., = 0.0, the value... [Pg.288]

Other Nuclei. Although most nmr experiments continue to involve H, or both, many other nuclei may also be utilized Several factors, including the value of I for the nucleus, the magnitude of the quadmpolar moment, the natural abundance and magnetogyric ratio of the isotope, or the possibihty of preparing enriched samples, need to be considered. The product of the isotopic parameters can be compared to the corresponding value for providing a measure of relative sensitivity or receptivity. Table 1 summarizes these factors for a number of isotopes. More complete information may... [Pg.404]

The Co nucleus decays with a half-life of 5.27 years by /5 emission to the levels in Ni. These levels then deexcite to the ground state of Ni by the emission of one or more y-rays. The spins and parities of these levels are known from a variety of measurements and require that the two strong y-rays of 1173 and 1332 keV both have E2 character, although the 1173 y could contain some admixture of M3. However, from the theoretical lifetime shown ia Table 7, the E2 contribution is expected to have a much shorter half-life and therefore also to dominate ia this decay. Although the emission probabilities of the strong 1173- and 1332-keV y-rays are so nearly equal that the difference cannot be determined by a direct measurement, from measurements of other parameters of the decay it can be determined that the 1332 is the stronger. Specifically, measurements of the continuous electron spectmm from the j3 -decay have shown that there is a branch of 0.12% to the 1332-keV level. When this, the weak y-rays, the internal conversion, and the internal-pair formation are all taken iato account, the relative emission probabilities of the two strong y-rays can be determined very accurately, as shown ia Table 8. [Pg.450]

As already mentioned, the enthalpy change A//° involved in an elementary propagation step corresponds to the equilibrium constant S. The parameter a, however, is purely entropically influenced mainly due to the steric restrictions during the formation of a helical nucleus. The determination of a, since it is related to the same power (3n - 2) of s, requires the consideration of the dependence of the thermodynamic parameters on the chain length (Eq. (9 a)). [Pg.193]

From these parameters, a high charge density on the iron nucleus can be inferred. It is interesting to note that this situation is not reflected by the spectroscopic... [Pg.19]

The relative magnitude of these two activation free energies determines the size and shape of the critical nucleus, and hence of the resulting crystal. If sliding diffusion is easy then extended chain crystals may form if it is hard then the thickness will be determined kinetically and will be close to lmin. The work so far has concentrated on obtaining a measure for this nucleus for different input parameters and on plotting the most likely path for its formation. The SI catastrophe does not occur because there is always a barrier against the formation of thick crystals which increases with /. [Pg.290]

Thus P is a structural parameter ranging between 0 and 1 that acts at the initial moments of the oxidation process of every segment the higher the degree of closure (v), the lower the probability (P) of any spontaneous conformational changes and the greater the anodic overpotential required to create a relaxation nucleus. Under these conditions both magnitudes are related by... [Pg.410]

The chemical shifts, Sp, of substituted arylphosphonic acids (9) have been found to be linearly related to the Hammett a and Taft ojt and cti parameters. The shielding of the phosphorus nucleus increases with the electron-withdrawing properties of the substituents, which is analogous... [Pg.249]

Here, I, I, and I are angular momentum operators, Q is the quadrupole moment of the nucleus, the z component, and r the asymmetry parameter of the electric field gradient (efg) tensor. We wish to construct the Hamiltonian for a nucleus if the efg jumps at random between HS and LS states. For this purpose, a random function of time / (f) is introduced which can assume only the two possible values +1. For convenience of presentation we assume equal... [Pg.110]

The electron density i/ (0)p at the nucleus primarily originates from the ability of s-electrons to penetrate the nucleus. The core-shell Is and 2s electrons make by far the major contributions. Valence orbitals of p-, d-, or/-character, in contrast, have nodes at r = 0 and cannot contribute to iA(0)p except for minor relativistic contributions of p-electrons. Nevertheless, the isomer shift is found to depend on various chemical parameters, of which the oxidation state as given by the number of valence electrons in p-, or d-, or /-orbitals of the Mossbauer atom is most important. In general, the effect is explained by the contraction of inner 5-orbitals due to shielding of the nuclear potential by the electron charge in the valence shell. In addition to this indirect effect, a direct contribution to the isomer shift arises from valence 5-orbitals due to their participation in the formation of molecular orbitals (MOs). It will be shown in Chap. 5 that the latter issue plays a decisive role. In the following section, an overview of experimental observations will be presented. [Pg.83]


See other pages where Nuclei parameters is mentioned: [Pg.198]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.1570]    [Pg.1847]    [Pg.2206]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.502]    [Pg.504]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.467]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.432]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.1107]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.443]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.502]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.83]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.6 ]




SEARCH



Kinetic Parameters and Size Distribution of the Nano-Nucleus

Quadrupolar nuclei parameters

Shape of a Nucleus Is Related to Kinetic Parameters

© 2024 chempedia.info