Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Notations group theory

As already mentioned, choosing the active space for CASSCF calculations is not always a trivial matter. In the systems under consideration, there is a plane of symmetry (that of the phenylene linker), which helps in classifying the MOs as CT and tt (or A and A", using group-theory notation). Experience shows that a reasonably balanced active space is made of the -ir system of the linker and one CT-orbital and one -ir-orbital per reactive site (carbene or nitrene) (Fig. 2). [Pg.139]

Tlte notation has been chosen so as to conform to representations oi tlte point group Dtii (or simplicity, however, at0 has been called ny, since no dtp species occur here. No explicit reference to group theory will be made,... [Pg.251]

In the following discussion, some language and notation of group theory are used for convenience. The meaning of this language or notation is made clear in Chapter 6. [Pg.23]

In these equations, Hw(qa, q, 0) and jls(qa, qfo, 0) are the dipole moment operators at initial time belonging, respectively, to the irreducible representations B and A of the C2 symmetry group that transforms themselves, the first one, according to x and v, and the last one, according to x2 and y2 (allowed Raman transition), where x and y and the Cartesian coordinates that are perpendicular to the C2 symmetry axis. Here, we prefer the notations g and u in place of A and B of group theory. [Pg.346]

In fact the relative coefficients within a set of symmetrically equivalent atoms, such as Cl, C3, C5, and Cg in para-benzosemiquinone, can be determined by group theory alone. The appropriate set of symmetrized orbitals, also listed in Table 1, can be obtained by use of character tables and procedures described in Refs. 3 to 6. In matrix notation, the symmetrized combinations are <1> = Up, where <1) and p are column vectors and U is the transformation matrix giving the relations shown in part (c) of Table 1. The transformation U and its transpose U can be used to simplify the solution of the secular matrix X since the matrix multiplication UXU gives the block diagonal form shown in part (6) of Table 1. [Pg.463]

State, A5 in the notation of group theory, and may here be taken simply as a band label. The Bloch state of angular form zy gives an identical energy symmetry requires the two bands to have the same energy for k in this direction. [Pg.483]

Schoenflies symbols are widely used to describe molecular symmetry, the symmetry of atomic orbitals, and in chemical group theory. The terminology of the important symmetry operators and symmetry elements used in this notation are given in Table A3.1. [Pg.221]

Finally, the group theory notation classifies the states by the symmetry behavior of their electronic wave functions. [Pg.347]

A O bond means, in this context, a bond described by an MO that possesses cylindrical symmetry about the M-ligand axis. This notation is widely used by chemists for single bonds (see 1.3.4). However, in group theory, the a notation is reserved for linear molecules. [Pg.24]

The notation n that is used here is almost never strictly correct according to group theory, where it reserved for doubly degenerate orbitals in linear molecules (Chapter 6). It is, however, widely used to refer to loal symmetry the expression n interaction is used when the two orbitals share a common nodal plane and have lateral overlap (3-1). [Pg.97]

If a set of functions/ = fi,fz, , fi, , fn is such that any symmetry operation, Ru, of the group G transform one of the functions,/, into a linear combination of the various functions of the set/, the set is said to be globally stable and to constitute a basis for the representation of the group G. As the symmetry operations maintain the positions of the atoms or interchange the positions of equivalent atoms, it can be shown that the set of atomic orbitals (AO) of a molecule constitute a basis for the representation of the point-group symmetry of the molecule. In what follows, we shall adopt the usual notation in group theory, and indicate a basis for a representation by T. [Pg.212]

Although the a-type orbitals point along the M—L bonds, the orbitals above are constructed from ligand orbitals that are perpendicular to these bonds. This is why they are often written 7T and 7t , even though this notation is not strictly correct according to group theory. [Pg.247]

The discussion in Chapter 4 is focused on symmetry and rigid motions. The notation e.stabli.shed in Chapter 3 for permutations is used in a mathematical investigation of the symmetries of a variety of different shapes. The symmetries of a pentagon form the basts of the very reliable Verhoeff check digit scheme presented in Chapter 5. Furthermore, the use of rigid motions to create elaborate patterns will serve as an introduction to the discussion of group theory that begins Chapter 5. [Pg.184]

We now turn to the same problem, except that we shall assmne a sharp boimdary (at x = 0) between the two parts of the pile and use the two group theory described in reports CP-1461 and CP-1554. The notation will be the same as that adopted in CP-1461. [Pg.516]

The correspondence of the notation of the irreducible representations of the double group Z, Z, n, A, 0, r, E 2, 3/2, 5/2. nji nd the nonrelativistic states are 0+,0 , 1,2,3,4,1/2,3/2,5/2 and n/2, respectively. The direct product for the irreducible representations of the double groups need to be defined so that one could use the double-group theory to derive relativistic electronic states from the nonrelativistic states. For example the direct product 21+ has irreducible representation and the corresponding Q, state is 0+, the direct product n A has irreducible representation 0 U what corresponds to 3,1 42 states. Similarly, the direct product Z n gives the 17 irreducible representation and corresponds to 1 42 state. More details can be found in [2, 26]. [Pg.9]

Flurry, R. L. Jr., Symmetry Groups, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1980. An excellent introduction to chemical applications of group theory. Our text assumes famil-arity with only the most elementary group theoretical ideas and notations. [Pg.107]

D + 6D, and S + SJL. In one group theory, the flux and adjoint flux are identical, but the derivation that follows differentiates between them because it eases the generalization to multigroup theory. However, it is assumed that the perturbations are small enough so that difference between the perturbed and unperturbed flux can be ignored, and so the prime notations will be dropped. [Pg.226]

The reaction scheme, differentiating an IPS from an IPN, is given in Figure The group theory notation is derived from papers by Sper-... [Pg.88]

The study of molecular vibrations will be introduced by a consideration of the elementary dynamical principles applying to the treatment of small vibrations. In order that attention may be focused on the dynamical principles rather than on the technique of their application, this chapter vill employ only relativelj familiar and straightforward mathematical methods, and the illustrations will be simple. This will serve adequately as an introduction to the applications of quantum mechanics and group theory to the problem of molecular vibrations. Since, how-ever, these straightforward methods become cumbersome and impractical, even for simple molecules, equivalent but more powerful techniques u.sing matrix and vector notations will be discussed in Chap. 4. [Pg.211]

The irreducible representations are labeled in the Schonfliess notation, which is explained in all books on group theory. Those in Table 2.2 can be easily understood as follows The irreps labelled A are symmetric to twofold rotation about all three twofold axes. Those labelled B are symmetric to rotation about one axis and antisymmetric to rotation about the other two the subscripts specify the unique axis, 1, 2, and 3 respectively referring to 2, y and x. Symmetry with respect to inversion is indicated by g and antisymmetry by u. Symmetric or antisymmetric behavior with respect to reflection in the mirror planes is implicit but unambiguous. It is clear from Table 2.1 that reflection in a mirror plane, that reverses the sign of the cartesian coordinate perpendicular to it, is equivalent to the sequence inversion, that reverses all three coordinates, followed (or preceded) by a twofold rotation about the perpendicular axis, that restores the original sign to the two in-plane coordinates. [Pg.40]


See other pages where Notations group theory is mentioned: [Pg.90]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.445]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.1265]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.562]    [Pg.1264]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.948]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.20]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.347 ]




SEARCH



Group theory

© 2024 chempedia.info