Nonporous polymers, definition

In an effort to optimize the solvent-containing passive sampler design, Zabik (1988) and Huckins (1988) evaluated the organic contaminant permeability and solvent compatibility of several candidate nonporous polymeric membranes (Huckins et al., 2002a). The membranes included LDPE, polypropylene (PP), polyvinyl chloride, polyacetate, and silicone, specifically medical grade silicone (silastic). Solvents used were hexane, ethyl acetate, dichloromethane, isooctane, etc. With the exception of silastic, membranes were <120- um thick. Because silicone has the greatest free volume of all the nonporous polymers, thicker membranes were used. Although there are a number of definitions of polymer free volume based on various mathematical treatments of the diffusion process, free volume can be viewed as the free space within the polymer matrix available for solute diffusion. 

A fundamental difference exists between the assumptions of the homogeneous and porous membrane models. For the homogeneous models, it is assumed that the membrane is nonporous, that is, transport takes place between the interstitial spaces of the polymer chains or polymer nodules, usually by diffusion. For the porous models, it is assumed that transport takes place through pores that mn the length of the membrane barrier layer. As a result, transport can occur by both diffusion and convection through the pores. Whereas both conceptual models have had some success in predicting RO separations, the question of whether an RO membrane is truly homogeneous, ie, has no pores, or is porous, is still a point of debate. No available technique can definitively answer this question. Two models, one nonporous and diffusion-based, the other pore-based, are discussed herein. 

Fig. 1.18A shows the pore size distribution for nonporous methacrylate based polymer beads with a mean particle size of about 250 pm [100]. The black hne indicates the vast range of mercury intrusion, starting at 40 pm because interparticle spaces are filled, and down to 0.003 pm at highest pressure. Apparent porosity is revealed below a pore size of 0.1 pm, although the dashed hne derived from nitrogen adsorption shows no porosity at aU. The presence or absence of meso- and micropores is definitely being indicated in the nitrogen sorption experiment. 

---