Nonideal behavior interaction parameters

The mixed cmc behavior of these (and many other) mixed surfactant systems can be adequately described by a nonideal mixed micelle model based on the psuedo-phase separation approach and a regular solution approximation with a single net interaction parameter B. However, the heats of micellar mixing measured by calorimetry show that the assumptions of the regular solution approximation do not hold for the systems investigated in this paper. This suggests that in these cases the net interaction parameter in the nonideal mixed micelle model should be interpreted as an excess free energy parameter. 

Although not normally detected, the third virial coeffident occasionally contributes to the nonideal behavior in ddnte solutions, and a curved plot is obtained, as shown in Figure 9.2(a). This increases the uncertainty of the extrapolation, bnt it can be overcome by recasting Equation 9.11 and introducing a polymer-solvent interaction parameter g... 

It needs binary data to derive the molecular interaction parameter W thus it is again a corrective rather than a predictive model (indeed, most existing models require binary data to represent the nonideal adsorption behavior of the system). 

Because we usually have no informationonthefunction ( ), in order to elucidate the nonideal electrochemical behavior (eg., the shape of the cycfic voltammogram), an interaction parameter is introduced that relates to the variations in the activity coefficients of the redox sites (second term in (5.38)). 

A summary of the phase behavior of a block copolymer swollen with a nonselective solvent follows the dilution approximation says that interaction parameter in a polymer scales with the volume fraction of the polymer in the solvent-polymer blend. This is attributed to the alteration of the interaction of the two blocks due to selective segregation of the solvent to the interface between the blocks. Comparison of this theory with experimental results for the shift in ODT has found that an exponent a must be added to adjust for nonideal behavior (Eqn. 3) in ideal behavior, a would have value of 1, but experimental values have ranged from 1.2 - 1.6. The value of the exponent cannot be predicted, but depends on the solvent and block copolymer system. This nonideal behavior is only observed for ODTs OOTs follow the dilution approximation with a equal to 1. 

Another type of nonideal SEC behavior, which will not be covered in this chapter, is related to the use of mixed mobile phases (multiple solvents). Because solute-solvent interactions play a critical role in controlling the hydrodynamic volume of a macromolecule, the use of mixed mobile phases may lead to deviations from ideal behavior. Depending on the solubility parameter differences of the solvents and the solubility parameter of the packing, the mobile phase composition within the pores of the packing may be different from that in the interstitial volume. As a result, the hydrodynamic volume of the polymer may change when it enters the packing leading to unexpected elution results. Preferential solvation of the polymer in mixed solvent systems may also lead to deviations from ideal behavior (11). 

In this paper, the various factors that affect its behavior, such as the size of a cosolvent molecule, the nonideality of water + cosolvent mixture, and the interactions between water and cosolvent with the protein, will be analyzed from a theoretical point of view. Experimental data regarding the preferential binding parameter and the protein partial molar volume at its infinite dilution will be used. The emphasis wiU be on urea as cosolvent. 

The determination of accurate intermolecular potentials has been a key focus in the understanding of collision and half-collision dynamics, but has been exceedingly difficult to obtain in quantitative detail for even the simplest molecular systems. Traditional methods of obtaining empirical intermolecular potential information have been from analysis of nonideal gas behavior, second virial coefficients, viscosity data and other transport phenomena. However, these data sample highly averaged collisional interactions over relative orientations, velocities, impact parameters, initial and final state energies, etc. As a result intermolecular potential information from such methods is limited to estimates of the molecular size and stickiness, i.e., essentially the depth and position of the energy minimum for an isotropic well. 

---