Nonbonded pair lists

Table 7.2 lists representative structures and examples. One thing to note that will save you some time memorizing information is that for molecules with no nonbonding pairs, the molecular geometry is identical to the electron pair geometry. 

For large systems, the computation of the energy can require 98% or more of the total computational effort, and within the energy computation, the pair interaction energy (van der Waals and electrostatic terms) can represent more than 90% of the total effort. For this reason, the aspects of the program that deal with the generation of the nonbond list and the computation of the nonbond energy are of critical importance. 

Just like any other valence-shell empty orbital, the empty Zr orbital may interact with any proximal electrons, including (i) nonbonding electron pair donors, abbreviated here as n-donors or n-electron pair for simplicity, (ii) 7t-bonds or 7t-electrons, or (iii) a-bonds or o-electrons. Such interactions may be intermolecular or intramolecular. Some of the significant examples are listed in a generalized manner in Scheme 1.3. 

F—F and M—F coupling constants for a series of octahedrally coordinated atoms are listed in Table VIII. BrF5 and IF6 may be considered to be octahedrally coordinated since a pair of nonbonding electrons occupies an axial site on the coordination sphere. F—F coupling interactions are between fluorine atoms on approximately axial and equatorial sites. In column four of Table VIII, M—F coupling constants have been divided... 

We have been trying to keep track of published parameters for EFFs. To help you track down needed parameters, we list in this appendix the references we found. We include many of the commonly used force fields. They are arranged alphabetically. For each force field, we list the functional groups or atoms that have been parameterized. The notation is explained in the original papers, but some of the acronyms we use include FF (empirical force fields), OOP (out-of-plane bending), LP (lone pair), and vdW (van der Waals) the symbol indicates nonbonded interactions. For each entry, there is one or more associated citations. Those citations are gathered after the table in alphabetical order by first author of the citation. 

Nonbonding electron pairs are good electron sources, especially lone pairs of anions. The following list gives the relative nucleophilicity of many lone pair nucleophiles in an Sn2 reaction on methyl iodide. An anion is always a better nucleophile than its neutral counterpart methoxide is almost 2 million times more nucleophilic than methanol. 

Let as apply this concept to the previous examples of additions of hydrogen bromide to 2-methylbut-2-ene. Since the reactant HBr molecule easily dissociates into H" and Br, the electron deficient H+ will readily react with the jT-electron cloud of the alkene molecule. The H+ ion is called the electrophile because it has affinity for the negatively charged electron clouds. The second ion Br" is negative and is called the nucleophile because it has affinity for the positively charged regions of the molecule of the second reactant. Nucleophiles can be easily recognized because their molecules always possess the nonbonded, electron lone pairs, the n-electrons. Several common nucleophiles and electrophiles are listed below ... 

Sidgwick s distinction between covalent bonds and coordinate links was widely accepted, and the terms coordinate bonds, electron donor-acceptor, and dative bonds were commonly used. But not all workers in the field believed that the distinction between a coordinate link and a normal covalent bond was real or significant. In the 1939 edition of The Nature of the Chemical Bond, Pauling listed three types of chemical bonds electrostatic, covalent, and metallic [37]. He described the NO bond in (CH3)3NO in terms of a Lewis structure wherein the N atom supplied the two electrons needed for a single covalent bond to the O atom which in addition carried three nonbonding electron pairs. He noted that bonds of this type had been described as a coordinate links and that an arrow had been used to indicate the transfer of electric charge from one atom to another, but dismissed the distinction as uimecessary We shall not find it convenient to make use of these names or these symbols. The statement was repeated verbatim in the 1960 edition [68]. 

---