Assays non-competitive

There are also examples of non-competitive assays in the literature for analyzing different clinically important species. For example, an immunosensor for the pathogenic bacterium Salmonella typhi and for bacterial toxins from pathogenic Vibrio chol-erae [21-23],... 

According to Ekins [27], the fundamental difference between competitive and non-competitive methods is based solely on the approach adopted to detect the antibody occupancy from which the analyte concentration in the system is deduced. Competitive assays rely on the indirect measurement of occupancy by observation of unoccupied sites. In this case the amount of antibody must be kept small to minimize errors in the indirect estimate of the occupied sites. Non-competitive assays rely on direct measurement of binding site occupancy so that the use of large amounts of antibody is advantageous. 

The conventional competitive or non-competitive assays do not allow continuous detection so that, for on-line measurements, the so-called displacement assays are usually applied. Typically, the antibody is immobilized onto a solid support and packed in a column, and the corresponding antigen is labeled. The antibody binding sites are saturated with labeled antigens and the sample, containing the free (unlabeled) analyte, is injected into the column, resulting in displacement of the bound labeled analyte, as the affinity of the antibody for the labeled analyte is usually much lower than its affinity for the unlabeled analyte. The displaced labeled analyte is eluted and detected at the outlet of the column and the measured signal is directly proportional to the analyte concentration in the sample. 

M ore details are given in the example in Section 6.3.1. This format represents a non-competitive assay. Right panel The two formats of noncompetitive and competitive assays. 

The non-competitive assay uses an excess of antibody. Different approaches to detect the bound antigen have been developed, the most common use an antibody, in excess, coupled to a solid phase. The bound antigen is then detected with a second antibody labeled in a way that aids detection (e.g., radioactive, fluorophore, etc.). The amount of antigen in the sample is then directly proportional to the amount of labeled antibody captured on the solid phase. 

Non-competitive assays with antibodies immobilized on the solid phase Immobilization of antibodies or their F(ab )2 on... 

Non-competitive assays with Clq immobilized on the solid phase... 

Figure 10)). This method has a distinct advantage over the direct labelling method as it gives almost the same high sensitivity and wide dynamic range as the non-competitive assay format. 

The response curve in case of a non-competitive assay is shown in Fig. 5.11. The labelled secondary antibody binds directly to the sample molecules. So the larger the number of sample molecules, the larger the signal Ac a A. This is only tme within a certain range of sample concentrations - for very high and very low... 

Fig. 5.11. Response curve for a non-competitive assay the larger the analyte concentration, the larger the signal generated.

Non-competitive assay A category of immunoassay that does not involve competition by antigens for a limited number of antibody binding sites. 

In non-competitive immunoassays, the antigen is a sandwich between two antibodies, the capture antibody and the detection antibody. Typically, the capture antibody is coated to a solid phase, such as a tube or a well, and the detection antibodies are labeled with either an isotope or an enzyme. The amount of antigen in an unknown sample of these immunoassays is directly proportional to the amount of labeled detection antibody measured by the detection system. Examples of non-competitive assays are IRMA and ELISA. Figure 1 illustrates different types of binding. 

---