Nodes with different connectivities

Interpenetrating 3D Nets Each Containing Two Types of Nodes with Different Connectivities... 

It was shown more than 2000-years ago by Euklides in Alexandria (Euklides Elementa ) that these are the only possible polyhedra that have integer values of n and p. Of course, many other polyhedra exist, but these all have either more than two nodes with different connectivity, or two or more -gons (or both). One chemically interesting examples is the fullerene Ceo polyhedron shown in Figure 10.3. 

A fundamental contribution is represented by a famous series of articles and books on crystal chemistry published many years ago by A. F. Wells [4], who analysed and classified a great number of nets. Fie emphasized the importance of describing a crystal structure in terms of its basic topology such a description not only provides a simple and elegant way of representing the structures but also evidences relations between structures that are not always apparent from the conventional descriptions. Wells introduced a method for the systematic generation of 3D arrays from 2D nets and also described many hypothetical motifs that were successively discovered within the realm of coordination polymers or of other extended systems. Flis results included a list of many simple nets described with only one kind of node (uninodal) or with two nodes of different connectivity (mainly binodal 3,4-connected). 

Another net for which we lack examples, but that seem relevant, is the mcf-d net, see Figure 9.22. This net has vertex symbols 4-5-5-5-5-52-52-8-8, 4-83-83 and genus 5. Note that this net has not alternating nodes of different connectivity, thus making a coordination polymer with nodes based on metal coordination and p -ligands less likely to adopt this net. 

The arcs connect the different nodes with each other and represent either the utilization of equipment or material flows. Material flows occur when materials are produced or consumed by tasks. All arcs are labeled by fractional numbers which describe the percentage of material transported to the successor node. The overall amounts of transported materials are products of the labels of the arcs and the batch sizes. 

Views of (a) 4-connected linkers with different length (b) the connection between 4-connected node and linker (Lin et al., 2006a). 

Figure 7.4 shows that the Amplified DPE with the difference vector behaves in much the same way as the original DPE where profiles have been altered and nodes have been shifted even outside the positive composition space. As before, with constant relative volatility systems, we are able to connect the (shifted) nodes with straight lines to form a transformed triangle (TT). 

Figure 4.29 Common three-dimensional network topologies (a) a-Po (or NaCI), uninodal, with 6-connecting octahedral nodes (b) diamond lattice with tetrahedral nodes (c) rutile, binodal with 3- and 6-connecting nodes. The networks (d) 10,3a and (e) 10,3b (ThSi2) have the same Wells notation and Schlafli symbol (10 ) (the shortest route is shown with white nodes) but a different topology.

Wang and Sun (2001) developed another numerical method to simulate textile processes and to determine the micro-geometry of textile fabrics. They called it a digital-element model. It models yams by pin-connected digital-rod-element chains. As the element length approaches zero, the chain becomes fully flexible, imitating the physical behavior of the yams. The interactions of adjacent yarns are modeled by contact elements. If the distance between two nodes on different yarns approaches the yam diameter, contact occurs between them. The yarn microstructure inside the fabric is determined by process mechanics, such as yarn tension and interyam friction and compression. The textile process is modeled as a nonlinear solid mechanics problem with boundary displacement (or motion) conditions. This numerical approach was identified as digital-element simulation rather than as finite element simulation because of a special yam discretization process. With the conventional finite element method, the element preserves... 

The subgraph Gy has two connected components the component contains reaction nodes (B and R), contains the environment node. The reader can himself make the reduction (restriction to and deletion of splitters) in the case when C is sulphur trioxide. According to Fig. 4-2 and the list (4.6.1), he will find node SI isolated in the first step, in the second step = B,R and = D, Al, A2, 0 (stream 13 connects D with A2). If Q = O2 or N2, and N° will be the same as in the preceding example (with different structures of the subgraphs), while if C, = H2O, G , will remain connected and contain the node 0. Finally if C is elemental sulphur then G k has nodes 0 and B, and is connected. Alas, the scheme is simplified, for example concerning the flow scheme of water and acids. Adding further streams and splitters, it can happen that the decomposition of Guk will comprise more components. 

The connection between two nodes is called a dyad, which consists of two different nodes with a link that represents the relationship between the two nodes. 

Point-to-point topologies are the simplest to imagine. As an example, picture two endpoints, a camera and a display, connected to each other. The bandwidth is always available and exclusively used by both nodes. But physical point-to-point connections compose the backbone of modem networks with different logical topologies. Nearly all camera interfaces use this type of topology (Fig. 5). 

---