NDDO neglect of diatomic differential

The NDDO (Neglect of Diatomic Differential Overlap) approximation is the basis for the MNDO, AMI, and PM3 methods. In addition to the integralsused in the INDO methods, they have an additional class of electron repulsion integrals. This class includes the overlap density between two orbitals centered on the same atom interacting with the overlap density between two orbitals also centered on a single (but possibly different) atom. This is a significant step toward calculatin g th e effects of electron -electron in teraction s on different atoms. 

It has been customary to classify methods by the nature of the approximations made. In this sense CNDO, INDO (or MINDO), and NDDO (Neglect of Diatomic Differential Overlap) form a natural progression in which the neglect of differential overlap is applied less and less fully. It is now clearer that there is a deeper division between methods, related to their objectives. On the one hand are approximate methods which set out to mimic the ab initio molecular orbital results. The objective here is simply to find a more economical method. On the other hand, some workers, recognizing the defects of the MO scheme, aim to produce more accurate results by the extensive use of parameters obtained from experimental data. This latter approach appears to be theoretically unsound since the formalism of the single-determinant wavefunction and the Hartree-Fock equations is retained. It can be argued that the use of the single-determinant wavefunction prevents the consistent achievement of predictions better than those obtained by the ab initio scheme where no further... 

Meta- Position in the Substituted Benzene Ring Minimum Energy Coordinates Modified Neglect of Differential Overlap [NDDO (Neglect of Diatomic Differential Overlap) Approximation, Method]... 

There are known strengths ind weaknesses of each semiempirieal method. The AMI and PM3 models only include s- and p-funetions, which limits their u.sefulncss for most elements of the periodic table that require d-orbitals. Many of the.se elements, however, arc not typically found in most drug-like molecules. More recent advances with MNDO/d include the incorporation of d-functions in the NDDO (neglect of diatomic differential overlap) model."" ""... 

Another semiempirical PCM formulation has been presented by Rauhut et al. (1993). They use a marching-cube algorithm to define tesserae (Lorensen and Cline, 1987). The flat mesh thus obtained is then projected on a van der Waals surface (factor Z =1.15). These authors point out that the full NDDO (Neglect of Diatomic Differential Overlap) expression of the (xm VBf xJ elements is convenient in order to have good results, when combined with the original PCM procedure for the surface charge renormalization. 

Conventionally, there are three levels of integral approaches CNDO (complete neglect of differential overlap), INDO (intermediate neglect of differential overlap), and NDDO (neglect of diatomic differential overlap). The last is the best of the approximations since it keeps the superior multipoles of charge distributions in the two-center interactions (unlike the others that shorten after the monopole). 

Diamagnetic shielding due to ab initio calculations = 561.8 (the tensor components are also given) [2] and 560.3 (values for the NDDO (neglect of diatomic differential overlap) approximation, see original paper) [22]. 

H = Hiickel, EH = extended Hiickel, PPP = Pariser-Pople-Parr, CNDO = complete neglect of differential overlap, INDO = intermediate neglect of differential overlap, NDDO = neglect of diatomic differential overlap, MNDO = modified neglect of differential overlap, MINDO = modified intermediate neglect of differential overlap. Note AMI and PM3 are MNDO methods that differ only in the way constants are chosen to approximate various integrals. 

---