Most Favoured Nations Treatment

The United States has also used trade and investment measures to influence the conduct of other States. For example, during the 1990s, Congress drew a link between the human rights record of China with most-favoured nations treatment of the World Trade Organization. There have also been instances where goods from States are banned from importation to the United States unless that State complies with certain standards set in U.S. law. Conversely US exports are banned from import into those countries. 

Another issue that should be addressed concerns the legality of the applicability of one treaty over another. As discussed earlier, the Chicago Convention, in Article 6, clearly lays down a restriction which would be contrary to the principles of the GATS Agreement regarding the Most Favoured Nations Treatment (MFN) Clause where each member is required to accord immediately and unccaiditionally to services and service suppliers of any other member treatment no less favourable than that it accords to like services and service suppliers of any other country. Would this mean that, for example, the United States and Canada, which, after many decades of... 

This comprises two components most-favoured-nation and national treatment. 

---