Morphology chemical structural polymer type

Figure 1.9 Classification of morphology by the chemical structural polymer type.

Schematic depiction of the structural evolution of polymer electrolyte membranes. The primary chemical structure of the Nafion-type ionomer on the left with hydrophobic backbone, side chains, and acid head groups evolves into polymeric aggregates with complex interfacial structure (middle). Randomly interconnected phases of these aggregates and water-filled voids between them form the heterogeneous membrane morphology at the macroscopic scale (right).

Lignin in the true middle lamella of wood is a random three-dimensional network polymer comprised of phenylpropane monomers linked together in different ways. Lignin in the secondary wall is a nonrandom two-dimensional network polymer. The chemical structure of the monomers and linkages which constitute these networks differ in different morphological regions (middle lamella vs. secondary wall), different types of cell (vessels vs. fibers), and different types of wood (softwoods vs. hardwoods). When wood is delignified, the properties of the macromolecules made soluble reflect the properties of the network from which they are derived. 

The condensation of amino acids and chemical structure of the respective polymers, chromatograms of their hydrolysates, and morphological features of microspheres have been described.The interaction of appropriate thermal copolyamino acids with hot or cold water proved to be a necessary condition for preparation of microspheres. The proteinoid microspheres are spherical and usually uniform in diameter in the range from 0.5 to 7 pm. Factors controlling size of microspheres are type of polymer, added substances, ratio of solid to liquid component in the mixture, presence and concentration of electrolytes in solution, temperature of solution, and rate of cooling. 

This universal calibration procedure is widely used for many different polymer types [9,10] the procedure can be used to allow for differences in morphology as well as differences of chemical type. However, it is important to note that the procedure cannot be applied to all polymer types exceptions are often found when the polymer molecule has some structure when in solution, or when there are unwanted interactions between the solute and the column packing. 

The selection of the dominant deformation mechanism in the matrix depends not only on the properties of this matrix material but also on the test temperature, strain rate, as well as the size, shape, and internal morphology of the rubber particles (BucknaU 1977, 1997, 2000 Michler 2005 Michler and Balta-Calleja 2012 Michler and Starke 1996). The properties of the matrix material, defined by its chemical structure and composition, determine not rally the type of the local yield zones and plastic deformation mechanisms active but also the critical parameters for toughening. In amorphous polymers which tend to form fibrillated crazes upon deformation, the particle diameter, D, is of primary importance. Several authors postulated that in some other amorphous and semiciystalline polymers with the dominant formation of dUatational shear bands or extensive shear yielding, the other critical parameter can be the interparticle distance (ID) (the thickness of the matrix ligaments between particles) rather than the particle diameter. 

The mechanical and viscoelastic behaviours of natural rubber based blends and interpenetrating polymer networks (IPNs) are fimctions of their structures or morphologies. These properties of blended materials are generally not constant and depend on the chemical nature and type of the polymer blends, and also enviromnental faetors involved with any measurements. Preparations of natural rubber blends and IPNs are well known as effeetive modifieation methods used to improve the original meehanieal and viscoelastie properties of one or both of the eomponents, or to obtain new natural rubber blended materials that exhibit widely variable properties. The most common consideration for their mechanical properties include strength, duetility, hardness, impact resistance and fracture toughness, each of which can be deformed by tension, compression, shear, flexure, torsion and impaet methods, or a eombination of two or more methods. Moreover, the viseoelastieity theory is a way to predict the behaviours of deformation of natural rubber blends and IPNs. The time and... 

A wide range of different chemical structures, morphologies and physical properties can be achieved by polymerising more than one monomer type into the polymer chain these copolymers may have random or ordered arrangements of the monomer types. 

---