Phase factors molecular systems

A single-determinant wave-function of closed shell molecular systems is invariant against any unitary transformation of the molecular orbitals apart from a phase factor. The transformation can be chosen in order to obtain LMOs. Starting from CMOs a number of localization procedures have been proposed to get LMOs the most commonly used methods are as given by the authors of (Edmiston et ah, 1963) and (Boys, 1966), while the procedures provided by (Pipek etal, 1989) and (Saebo etal., 1993) are also of interest. It could be stated that all the methods yield comparable results. Each LMO densities are found to be relatively concentrated in some spatial region. They are, furthermore, expected to be determined mainly by that part of the molecule which occupies that given region and its nearby environment rather than by the whole system. 

We hope that the studies summarized above will motivate time-resolved interference experiments on Jahn-Teller systems. Half-odd quantum numbers for molecular pseudorotation have been reported in the continuous wave spectra of Na, [47], benzene [48] and sym-triazine [44]. The half-odd quantum numbers are strong evidence for the presence of geometric phase factors. Benzene and sym-triazine have nondegenerate ground states and would therefore be the most obvious choices for phase sensitive measurements of the kind we propose. The 3s E Rydberg state of 5ym-triazine has the simplifying feature of exhibiting Jahn-Teller... 

The above illustrations and discussion lead us to several general conclusions concerning the use of neutron spectroscopy in the study of torsional vibrations (and other large-amplitude modes) in molecular systems. First, the neutron technique-since it involves the interaction of neutrons with vibrating nuclei and is especially sensitive to large amplitude motions—can for appropriate molecules be an ideal complement for optical spectroscopy. Neutron spectroscopy, however, is hampered somewhat by the available instrumental resolution ( 10 cm-1) and by the inherent recoil resolution broadening in fluid-phase spectra. In addition, present accessibility of instrumentation for the neutron method (for low k molecular spectroscopy) is limited. For example, there are only a few reactors in the United States where appropriate instruments and intensity exist for such measurements (neutron sources and instrumentation amenable to the study of crystal and liquid structure and interatomic and intermolecular dynamics are more accessible). These factors make it imperative that studies of molecular systems be chosen with some care. 

The method of Edmiston and Ruedenberg is based on the generalization of equivalent orbitals [3-5]. It is known that a one-determinant wavefonction for closed-shell system is invariant (to a phase factor of unity) to any unitary transformation of the tp, canonical molecular orbitals (CMOs). As both the Coulomb and the exchange interaction energy terms contain the same... 

For a linear molecule, the position of the symmetry axis (the molecule-fixed. z-axis) in space is specified by only two Euler angles, / and 7, which are respectively identical to the spherical polar coordinates 6 and (see Fig. 2.4). The third Euler angle, a, which specifies the orientation of the molecule-fixed x- and y-axes, is unaffected by molecular rotation but appears explicitly as an O- dependent phase factor in the rotational basis functions [Eq. (2.3.41)]. Cartesian coordinates in space- and molecule-fixed systems are related by the geometrical transformation represented by the 3x3 direction cosine matrix (Wilson et al., 1980, p. 286). The direction cosine matrix a given by Hougen (1970, p. 18) is obtained by setting a = 7t/2 (notation of Wilson et al, 1980 6 fi,4)=, x = oi 7t/2). The direction cosine matrix is expressed in terms of sines and cosines of 9 and 4>. Matrix elements (J M O la JMQ), evaluated in the JMQ) basis, of the direction cosines, are expressed in terms of the J, M, and quantum numbers. The direction cosine matrix elements of Hougen (1970, p. 31), Townes and Schawlow (1955, p. 96), and Table 2.1 assume the basis set definition derived from Eq. (2.3.40) and the phase choice a = 7t/2 ... 

Note that here 8, (j> are coordinates of the electron in the molecule-fixed coordinate system 8, do not specify, nor are they affected by, the orientation of the molecule-fixed coordinate system relative to the laboratory-fixed system. Since the dependence of an orbital angular momentum basis function of the one-electron ( A)) or many-electron ( A)) type can be expressed in terms of a factor e A( + °) or e A( +< °), where phase factor, the effect of crv xz) on a molecular orbital becomes... 

The k appears as a parameter in the equation similarly to the nuclear positions in molecular Hartree-Fock theory. The solutions are continuous as a function of k, and provide a range of energies called a band, with the total energy per unit cell being calculated by integrating over k space. Fortunately, the variation with k is rather slow for non-metaUic systems, and the integration can be done numerically by including relatively few points. Note that the presence of the phase factors in eq. (3.76) means that the matrices in eq. (3.79) are complex quantities. 

In aqueous two-phase systems, the target molecule and impurities can be separated due to their differences in solubility between the liquid phases. Factors such as the surface properties of proteins, electrical charge, hydro-phobicity and molecular mass must be taken into consideration. ... 

---