Models aggregate, solid fraction

Fig. 19 (a) Normalized SANS curves in different D20/DMF-d7 compositions at a polymer volume fraction of 0.25%. Solid lines represent fits with a spherical core shell model. Data in pure DMF-dv were fitted with a Beaucage form factor, (b) Aggregation number P plotted versus interfacial tension, y. The solid line depicts the power-law dependence, P rj as predicted by Halperin for star-like micelles [40]. Reprinted with permission from [45]. Copyright (2004) American Chemical Society... [Pg.114]

Fig. 37 Experimentally determined growth behavior and comparison with a unified nucleation and growth model. Time dependence of the aggregation number, Pmeam extracted from the fits for all three total volume fractions on a logarithmical time scale 0.125% (stars), 0.25% (squares), and 0.5% (triangles). Solid lines represent a fit using the nucleation model described in the text. Typical error bars are shown [183]. Copyright (2009) by the American Physical Society...

$Fig. 37 Experimentally determined growth behavior and comparison with a unified nucleation and growth model. Time dependence of the aggregation number, Pmeam extracted from the fits for all three total volume fractions on a logarithmical time scale 0.125% (stars), 0.25% (squares), and 0.5% (triangles). Solid lines represent a fit using the nucleation model described in the text. Typical error bars are shown [183]. Copyright (2009) by the American Physical Society...$

Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...