Methylhexanes structures

Draw a condensed structural diagram for 3-ethyl-2-methylhexane. 

The biperoxy radical produced by the ceric ion oxidation of 2,5-di-methylhexane-2,5-dihydroperoxide decays rapidly with first-order kinetics [k = ioio.e exp( -11,500 1000)/RT sec.1 = 180 sec."1 at 30°C. (30)]. After the first-order decay has run to completion, there is a residual radical concentration (—4% of the initial hydroperoxide concentration) which decays much more slowly by a second-order process. The residual second-order reaction cannot be eliminated or changed even by repeated recrystallization of the dihydroperoxide. This suggests that a small fraction of the biperoxy radicals react intermolecularly rather than by an intramolecular process and thus produce monoperoxy radicals. The bimolecular decay constant for this residual species of peroxy radical is similar to that found for the structurally similar radical from 1,1,3,3-tetra-methylbutyl hydroperoxide. Photolysis of the dihydroperoxide gave radicals with second-order decay kinetics which are presumed to be 2,5-hydroperoxyhexyl-5-peroxy radicals. 

Systematic name a name composed of syllables defining the structure of a compound e.g.. chlorobenzene. 2-methylhexane. 

Examination of this structure shows that the longest chain has six carbons rather than five. Therefore, the correct name is 3-methylhexane. 

Draw formulas for all structural isomers of the mono-chloro compound produced by treating a limited quantity of CI2 with (a) 2-methylhexane and (b) 3-methylhexane. 

Practice Problem 3. Draw the structure of 3-isopropyl-2-methylhexane. 

Write structural formulas for the following organic compounds (a) 3-methylhexane, (b) 1,3,5-trichloro-cyclohexane, (c) 2,3-dimethylpentane, (d) 2-phenyl-4-bromopentane, (e) 3,4,5-trimethyloctane. 

These were identified, with a lack of structural precision, by Merritt et al. (1970) in green and roasted coffee, confirmed as 2-methylpentane and 2-methylhexane in the TNO lists (1996) but as unkn.str. by Holscher and Steinhart (1995). (A.25) has been identified in green arabica and robusta, each of six origins by Procida et al. (1997), who also found it in a Guatemala arabica at different roasting times. 

In the last structure, the methyl group is on the carbon atom with the lowest number. The name of the compound is therefore 3-methylhexane and not 4-methylhexane. 

Give the structures of all possible products when 2-chloro-2-methylhexane reacts by the El mechanism. 

In Table 8.1, we have listed as novel three distance-based matrices the square root distance matrix, the -root distance matrix, and the distance squared matrix, but not because they are new in content and not resembling something already known or that they are original in conception. They are certainly not new because they have been already used in physics and mathematics. However, because they appear to be of potential interest for chemistry and are unknown in chemical literature, one may consider them as a novelty for chemistry. In Table 8.3, we have illustrated the square root distance matrix and the n-root distance matrix, again for the case of 3-methylhexane and norbomane, a bicyclic also seven carbon atom structure. We start with the square root and n-root distance matrix and will discuss the distance squared matrix later. 

The square root distance matrix does reduce automatically the influence of more distant neighbors in a natural way, so it is of interest. In that respect, even better is the n-root matrix, illustrated at bottom in Table 8.3 on 3-methylhexane and norbomane because now with increases in distance the root exponent also increases, which more drastically decreases the role of vertices at larger distances. We are not proposing the square root matrix and the related n-root matrix as an answer that will cure the ill features of the distance matrix as a source for construction of molecular descriptors to be used in structure-property-activity studies, but more to illustrate an alternative modification of the distance matrix for construction of topological indices. 

Draw a structure for each alkane. (a) 2-methylbutane (b) 3-ethyl-2-methylhexane (c) 3-isopropylheptane (d) 2,5-dimethyloctane 46. Draw a structure for each alkane. (a) 3-ethylhexane (b) 3,3-dimethylpentane (c) 3-ethyl-3-methylpentane (d) 4,4-diethyloctane... 

Compound A has molecular formula C7Hi2-Hydrogenation of compound A produces 2-methylhexane. Hydroboration-oxidation of compound A produces an aldehyde. Draw the stmcture of compound A, and draw the structure of the aldehyde produced upon hydroboration-oxidation of compound A. 

There are times when a three-dimensional representation is important, hut the subject is a racemic mixture of the two enantiomers rather than one enantiomer. Unless both enantiomers are drawn, the figure appears to focus only on a single enantiomer. Our molecule, 3-methylhexane, illustrates this point in Figure 4.16. If we are talking about a racemic mixmre of 3-methylhexane but want to show the three-dimensional structure of this molecule, we should, stricdy speaking, draw both of the enantiomers. In practice this is rarely done, and you must be alert for the problem. Unless optical activity is specifically indicated, it is usually the racemate that is meant. 

---