Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

MCMC simulation

The adaptive MCMC simulation method is applied to updating the robust reliability for a two-story structural frame, depicted in Figure 2.21. The bay width and story height are 5.0 m and 2.5 m, respectively. The Young s modulus and mass density are taken to be 200 GPa and 7800 kg/m, respectively. The beams have a cross-sectional area of 0.01 vn5 and a moment of inertia of 6.0 X 10 m but they are 0.02 m and 1.5 x 10 m" for the columns. As a result, the structure has modal frequencies of 5.20 and 15.4 Hz. The structure is assumed to have 1.0% of critical damping for all modes. A simple model with two degrees of freedom is used in the system identification in order to estimate the inter-story stiffnesses and to assess the reliability of the structure. Specifically, the stiffness matrix is given by ... [Pg.54]

Keywords Reliabihty growth Model Bayesian analysis Dirichlet distribution MCMC simulation Gibbs... [Pg.1616]

Stochastic Network Model for the Pore Phase 689 24.3.5.1 MCMC Simulation for Edge Rearrangement... [Pg.689]

Figure 24.16 Edge length distributions (a) from the modified graph and a fitted (shifted) P-distribution (black solid line) (b) from the graph generated by the Hakimi-Havel algorithm (c) from the graph after MCMC-simulation. Copyright (2011) ]. Mater. Sd. Figure 24.16 Edge length distributions (a) from the modified graph and a fitted (shifted) P-distribution (black solid line) (b) from the graph generated by the Hakimi-Havel algorithm (c) from the graph after MCMC-simulation. Copyright (2011) ]. Mater. Sd.
The resulting distribution of edge lengths after the MCMC simulation as described in the previous section can be seen in Figure 24.16c, where the fitted gamma distribution is also plotted. [Pg.690]

A realization of the random geometric graph model, where the edge lengths have been fitted to real data by the above-described MCMC simulation, can be seen in Figure 24.17. Note that Figure 24.17 just shows a small cutout of a realization of the network model describing the pore phase of non-woven GDL. [Pg.690]

MARKOV CHAIN MONTE CARLO (MCMC) SIMULATION... [Pg.157]

Generating Samples in Robust Reliability Based on Adaptive MCMC Simulation Technique... [Pg.2972]

Therefore, the data do appear to be consistent with an elementary reaction. Below, we test this hypothesis more rigorously using MCMC simulation with the exact posterior. [Pg.402]

While analytical manipulation of this formula is difficult, MCMC simulation is a powerful tool to obtain posterior expectations of the form... [Pg.403]

When the dimension of 9, a) space is small, it may be possible to compute (8.152) by quadrature, but MCMC simulation is generally more efficient. [Pg.403]

To compute an expectation [g y] using MCMC simulation, we rewrite (8.149) to integrate over all values of [Pg.404]

We use MCMC simulation to generate a sequence (0[ "1, o-t " ) that is distributed according to 7Ts(9, a y), such that for a large number Ns of samples, the expectation is approximately... [Pg.404]

MCOPTS is a structure that controls the operation of the MCMC simulation and contains the following fields (and default values) ... [Pg.405]

We now compute the probability that 02 > 5 that is, that the protein expression of the mutant strain is five units above that of the wild-type strain. We nse MCMC simulation to compute the expectation of the indicator... [Pg.406]

Figure 8.6 Margiaal 2-D posterior density for the protein expression data, computed fiom MCMC simulation. Figure 8.6 Margiaal 2-D posterior density for the protein expression data, computed fiom MCMC simulation.
We next use the MCMC approach to study again the hypothesis that the reaction A + B C is elementary, given the data in Table 8.1. We compute the 95% HPD for the 2-D maiginal posterior density p(92,di y). If this HPD region contains the point ( 2 = 1, 3 = 1), we cannot support the conclusion that the hypothesis is false (i.e., the reaction is not elementary). We compute this marginal density using MCMC simulation 1 ... [Pg.411]

MCMC simulation with the multiresponse marginal posterior density... [Pg.419]

Figure 8.9 Marginal 1-D density for ki computed from multiresponse data of a chemical reaction using MCMC simulation. Figure 8.9 Marginal 1-D density for ki computed from multiresponse data of a chemical reaction using MCMC simulation.
D marginal posterior densities and HPD regions are computed from MCMC simulation for multiresponse data using the routines... [Pg.421]

From MCMC simulation, we can compute posterior expectations and 1-D and 2-D... [Pg.425]

Here we provide an approximation of the Bayes factor for single-response data that does not require MCMC simulation. Let the sum of squared errors for a model be... [Pg.428]


See other pages where MCMC simulation is mentioned: [Pg.133]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.1078]    [Pg.569]    [Pg.570]    [Pg.576]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.680]    [Pg.680]    [Pg.681]    [Pg.677]    [Pg.678]    [Pg.688]    [Pg.689]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.2036]    [Pg.2972]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.422]    [Pg.428]   


SEARCH



MCMC

© 2024 chempedia.info