Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Lorentz transformation general

It relates the space time coordinates xf of an event as labeled by an observer 0, to the space-time coordinates of the same event as labeled by an observer O . The most general homogeneous Lorentz transformation is the real linear transformation (9-8) which leaves invariant the quadratic form... [Pg.489]

The generation of invariants in the Lorentz transformation of four-vectors has been interpreted to mean that the transformation is equivalent to a rotation. The most general rotation of a four-vector, defined as the quaternion q = w + ix + jy + kz is given by [39]... [Pg.157]

The absence of an E(3) field does not affect Lorentz symmetry, because in free space, the field equations of both 0(3) electrodynamics are Lorentz-invariant, so their solutions are also Lorentz-invariant. This conclusion follows from the Jacobi identity (30), which is an identity for all group symmetries. The right-hand side is zero, and so the left-hand side is zero and invariant under the general Lorentz transformation [6], consisting of boosts, rotations, and space-time translations. It follows that the B<3) field in free space Lorentz-invariant, and also that the definition (38) is invariant. The E(3) field is zero and is also invariant thus, B(3) is the same for all observers and E(3) is zero for all observers. [Pg.157]

The result is obtained that Faraday s law of induction is invariant under a Z boost. Similarly, it can be shown to be invariant under the general Lorentz transformation, and all solutions are invariant. In general, on the U(l) level... [Pg.158]

To get exact solutions that are symmetric in all the variables, we exploit the formulas for generating solutions by Lorentz transformations (see the previous subsection) and thus come to the following general form of the Poincare-invariant ansatz ... [Pg.307]

Relative motion according to Lorentz transformation refers specifically to unaccelerated uniform motion and is therefore known as special relativity (SR). The theory which developed to also take acceleration into account is known as general relativity (TGR). Based on the demonstration, by Eotvos and others, that there is no difference between the inertial and the gravitational mass of an object, TGR also became the theory of the gravitational field. The world line of an accelerated object appears curved in a Minkowski... [Pg.19]

Not only the laws of Nature but also all major scientific theories are statements of observed symmetries. The theories of special and general relativity, commonly presented as deep philosophical constructs can, for instance, be formulated as representations of assumed symmetries of space-time. Special relativity is the recognition that three-dimensional invariances are inadequate to describe the electromagnetic field, that only becomes consistent with the laws of mechanics in terms of four-dimensional space-time. The minimum requirement is euclidean space-time as represented by the symmetry group known as Lorentz transformation. [Pg.25]

Minkowski) as co-ordinates in a four-dimensional space, in which x z ictf represents the square of the distance from the origin a Lorentz transformation then represents a rotation round the origin in this space. Minkowski s idea has developed into a geometrical view of the fundamental laws of physics, culminating in the inclusion of gravitation in Einstein s so-called general theory of relativity. [Pg.270]

We finally note that more general Lorentz transformations are now obtained easily because any proper Lorentz transformation can be written in a unique way as the product of a boost and a rotation. [Pg.60]

Let us check first whether if i = 0, then everything is OK. Yes, it is. Indeed, the denominator equals 1, and we have t = t and x = x. Let us see what would happen if the velocity of light were equal to infinity. Then, the Lorentz transformation becomes identical to the Galilean one. In general, after expanding t and jc in a power series of v /c, we obtain... [Pg.116]

Further, we will analyze the situation from Figure A. 5.1, for which the 3D vector of velocity has the components v = (v, 0,0). Although non-unique in general, there is convenient to choose the sub-matrix A , a,P = 1,2,3, in such way that together with the above (time-time and space-time) components to generate Lorentz transformations as phenomenologically deduced this form can be... [Pg.591]

The Levi-Civita tensor is a natural generalization of the totally antisymmetric third-rank tensor 6, as defined by Eq. (2.9). For Lorentz transformations A with det A = +1 the Levi-Civita pseudo-tensor is indeed a tensor which has... [Pg.65]

So far, only general properties of Lorentz transformations have been investigated but no explicit expression for the transformation matrix A has yet been given. We are now going to derive the transformation matrix A for a Lorentz boost in x-direction in a very clear and elementary fashion. For t = t = 0 the two inertial frames IS and IS shall coincide, and the constant motion of IS relative to IS shall be described by the velocity vector v = vCx, cf. Figure 3.2. Since the y- and z-directions are not affected by this transformation, we explicitly write down the transformation given by Eq. (3.12) (for a = 0) for the relevant subspace... [Pg.67]

We now proceed to derive the Dirac states for a freely moving electron of mass Me- Note that the charge of the fermion does not enter the Dirac equation for this fermion being at rest or moving freely with constant velocity v. The solutions in Eqs. (5.72) and (5.73) may now be subjected to a general Lorentz boost as given by Eq. (3.81) into an inertial frame of reference moving relatively to the previous one, in which the fermion is at rest, with velocity (— ). This option, namely that the solutions for a complicated kinematic problem can be obtained from those of a simple kinematic problem in a suitably chosen frame of reference by a Lorentz transformation, cannot be overemphasized from a conceptual point of view. However, instead of this Lorentz transformation a direct solution of the Dirac Eq. (5.23) is easier. For this purpose we choose an ansatz of plane waves,... [Pg.175]

For arbitrary relative motion of the two particles, we will later need a more general form of the Lorentz transformation for the position vector r. According to this form the position vector r in the moving frame is expressed as... [Pg.11]

Inserting this expression in the general Lorentz transformation, (3.59), yields... [Pg.28]

This concludes our introduction to relativistic symmetry. Our aim has been to relate closely to features that should be familiar to the practicing quantum chemist. In particular, we have put some emphasis on the double groups, which represent a rather straightforward extension of the methods and concepts of nonrelativistic symmetry. We have also provided a more general discussion that shows how the double group symmetry arises as the direct product of the underlying symmetries in the two separate physical spaces considered—spin space and the four-space spanned by the Lorentz transformations. In the chapters to follow, we will repeatedly exploit both SU 2) (g) G, G 0(3) symmetry and Kramers symmetry to develop and simplify methods for quantum chemical calculations on relativistic systems. [Pg.99]


See other pages where Lorentz transformation general is mentioned: [Pg.765]    [Pg.714]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.1395]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.684]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.588]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.32]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.11 ]




SEARCH



General Transformations

Lorentz

Lorentz transformation

© 2024 chempedia.info