Localized electrons, atomic description magnetic moment

In the Introduction the problem of construction of a theoretical model of the metal surface was briefly discussed. If a model that would permit the theoretical description of the chemisorption complex is to be constructed, one must decide which type of the theoretical description of the metal should be used. Two basic approaches exist in the theory of transition metals (48). The first one is based on the assumption that the d-elec-trons are localized either on atoms or in bonds (which is particularly attractive for the discussion of the surface problems). The other is the itinerant approach, based on the collective model of metals (which was particularly successful in explaining the bulk properties of metals). The choice between these two is not easy. Even in contemporary solid state literature the possibility of d-electron localization is still being discussed (49-51). Examples can be found in the literature that discuss the following problems high cohesion energy of transition metals (52), their crystallographic structure (53), magnetic moments of the constituent atoms in alloys (54), optical and photoemission properties (48, 49), and plasma oscillation losses (55). 

Since the magnitude of the atomic moment will be shown to depend sharply upon the collective versus localized character of the electrons, magnetic as well as electric data will be found (see Chapter III) to support these tentative conclusions. Therefore, a brief summary is given of the formal results and of the assumptions made for the collective (MO) versus localized (HL) descriptions of electrons in crystals. 

---